Abstract
Earlier on-site investigations and laboratory studies have shown that varying corrosion rates are
obtained when different commercially available instruments are used. The different confinement techniques,
rather than the different electrochemical techniques used in the instruments, are considered to be the main
reason for the discrepancies. This paper presents a method for the quantitative assessment of confinement
techniques based on monitoring the operation of the corrosion rate instrument and the current distribution
between the electrode assembly on the concrete surface and a segmented reinforcement bar embedded in
the concrete. The applicability of the method was demonstrated on two commercially available corrosion
rate instruments based on different confinement techniques. The method provided an explanation of the
differences in performance of the two instruments. Correlated measurements of linear polarisation
resistance and macro-cell currents allowed the determination of calibration factors. Both instruments
overestimated the corrosion rate of passive reinforcement, but underestimated the corrosion rate of
reinforcement with intense localised corrosion.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Materials and Structures |
| Volume | 42 |
| Issue number | 8 |
| Pages (from-to) | 1059-1076 |
| ISSN | 1359-5997 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2009 |
Keywords
- confinement
- corrosion rate
- reinforced concrete
- reinforcement corrosion
- polarisation resistance
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Corrosion rate of steel in concrete - Evaluation of confinement techniques for on-site corrosion rate'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver