Coping Safely with Complex Systems

Jens Rasmussen (Invited author)

Research output: Contribution to conferencePaperResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The general dependence on large scale systems together with rapidly changing technology require predictive models of the performance of complex systems in order to be able to judge in advance the functionality and safety of new system concepts. Complex systems including human actors, however, cannot be modelled by quantitative, deterministic models and causal models in terms of objects and events have typically been adopted. The paper presents a discussion of several basic difficulties with this approach. Definition of human error during supervisory tasks is becoming increasingly difficult, and post-hoc identification of causes of an accident depends on a pragmatic stop-rule for the termination of the analysis. This has theoretical, as well as ethical and legal implications. Empirical verification of the design of a complex system, likewise, raises the question of stop-rules for adjusting the experimental conditions. In addition, there is a need for the development of predictive models of human performance in complex systems. For intellectual, creative tasks, they cannot be in terms of procedural task descriptions but have to be based on higher level 'first principles' which take into account goal oriented, adaptive human characteristics. This approach is discussed for models of individual human actors swell as for models of organizations managing large scale systems.
Original languageEnglish
Publication date1988
Number of pages12
Publication statusPublished - 1988
Externally publishedYes
EventAAAS Annual Meeting 1988 - Boston, United States
Duration: 11 Feb 198815 Feb 1988

Conference

ConferenceAAAS Annual Meeting 1988
CountryUnited States
CityBoston
Period11/02/198815/02/1988

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Coping Safely with Complex Systems'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this