Coping Safely with Complex Systems

Jens Rasmussen

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearch

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The general dependence on large scale systems together with rapidly changing technology require predictive models of the performance of complex systems in order to be able to judge in advance the functionality and safety of new system concepts. Complex systems including human actors, however, cannot be modelled by quantitative, deterministic models and causal models in terms of objects and events have typically been adopted. The paper presents a discussion of several basic difficulties with this approach. Definition of human error during supervisory tasks is becoming increasingly difficult, and post-hoc identification of causes of an accident depends on a pragmatic stop-rule for the termination of the analysis. Empirical verification of the design of a complex system, likewise, raises the question of stop-rules for adjusting the experimental conditions. In addition, there is a need for the development of predictive models of human performance in complex systems. For intellectual, creative tasks, they cannot be in terms of procedural task descriptions but have to be based on higher level 'first principles' which take into account goal oriented, adaptive human characteristics. This approach is discussed for models of individual human actors as well as for models of organizations managing large scale systems.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages13
ISBN (Print)87-550-1497-6
Publication statusPublished - 1989
Externally publishedYes
SeriesRisø-M
Number2769
ISSN0418-6435

Keywords

  • Risø-M-2769

Cite this

Rasmussen, J. (1989). Coping Safely with Complex Systems. Risø-M, No. 2769
Rasmussen, Jens. / Coping Safely with Complex Systems. 1989. 13 p. (Risø-M; No. 2769).
@book{45defdb3a5dc4d578cd7850f44fda419,
title = "Coping Safely with Complex Systems",
abstract = "The general dependence on large scale systems together with rapidly changing technology require predictive models of the performance of complex systems in order to be able to judge in advance the functionality and safety of new system concepts. Complex systems including human actors, however, cannot be modelled by quantitative, deterministic models and causal models in terms of objects and events have typically been adopted. The paper presents a discussion of several basic difficulties with this approach. Definition of human error during supervisory tasks is becoming increasingly difficult, and post-hoc identification of causes of an accident depends on a pragmatic stop-rule for the termination of the analysis. Empirical verification of the design of a complex system, likewise, raises the question of stop-rules for adjusting the experimental conditions. In addition, there is a need for the development of predictive models of human performance in complex systems. For intellectual, creative tasks, they cannot be in terms of procedural task descriptions but have to be based on higher level 'first principles' which take into account goal oriented, adaptive human characteristics. This approach is discussed for models of individual human actors as well as for models of organizations managing large scale systems.",
keywords = "Ris{\o}-M-2769",
author = "Jens Rasmussen",
year = "1989",
language = "English",
isbn = "87-550-1497-6",

}

Rasmussen, J 1989, Coping Safely with Complex Systems. Risø-M, no. 2769.

Coping Safely with Complex Systems. / Rasmussen, Jens.

1989. 13 p. (Risø-M; No. 2769).

Research output: Book/ReportReportResearch

TY - RPRT

T1 - Coping Safely with Complex Systems

AU - Rasmussen, Jens

PY - 1989

Y1 - 1989

N2 - The general dependence on large scale systems together with rapidly changing technology require predictive models of the performance of complex systems in order to be able to judge in advance the functionality and safety of new system concepts. Complex systems including human actors, however, cannot be modelled by quantitative, deterministic models and causal models in terms of objects and events have typically been adopted. The paper presents a discussion of several basic difficulties with this approach. Definition of human error during supervisory tasks is becoming increasingly difficult, and post-hoc identification of causes of an accident depends on a pragmatic stop-rule for the termination of the analysis. Empirical verification of the design of a complex system, likewise, raises the question of stop-rules for adjusting the experimental conditions. In addition, there is a need for the development of predictive models of human performance in complex systems. For intellectual, creative tasks, they cannot be in terms of procedural task descriptions but have to be based on higher level 'first principles' which take into account goal oriented, adaptive human characteristics. This approach is discussed for models of individual human actors as well as for models of organizations managing large scale systems.

AB - The general dependence on large scale systems together with rapidly changing technology require predictive models of the performance of complex systems in order to be able to judge in advance the functionality and safety of new system concepts. Complex systems including human actors, however, cannot be modelled by quantitative, deterministic models and causal models in terms of objects and events have typically been adopted. The paper presents a discussion of several basic difficulties with this approach. Definition of human error during supervisory tasks is becoming increasingly difficult, and post-hoc identification of causes of an accident depends on a pragmatic stop-rule for the termination of the analysis. Empirical verification of the design of a complex system, likewise, raises the question of stop-rules for adjusting the experimental conditions. In addition, there is a need for the development of predictive models of human performance in complex systems. For intellectual, creative tasks, they cannot be in terms of procedural task descriptions but have to be based on higher level 'first principles' which take into account goal oriented, adaptive human characteristics. This approach is discussed for models of individual human actors as well as for models of organizations managing large scale systems.

KW - Risø-M-2769

M3 - Report

SN - 87-550-1497-6

BT - Coping Safely with Complex Systems

ER -

Rasmussen J. Coping Safely with Complex Systems. 1989. 13 p. (Risø-M; No. 2769).