Comparison of transition-matrix sampling procedures

D. Yevick; M. Reimer; Bjarne Tromborg

doi:10.1364/JOSAA.26.000184

Comparison of transition-matrix sampling procedures

D. Yevick, M. Reimer, Bjarne Tromborg

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

Abstract

We compare the accuracy of the multicanonical procedure with that of transition-matrix models of static and dynamic communication system properties incorporating different acceptance rules. We find that for appropriate ranges of the underlying numerical parameters, algorithmically simple yet highly accurate procedures can be employed in place of the standard multicanonical sampling algorithm.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics Image Science and Vision
Volume	26
Issue number	1
Pages (from-to)	184-187
ISSN	1084-7529
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1364/JOSAA.26.000184
Publication status	Published - 2009

Access to Document

10.1364/JOSAA.26.000184

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{678d5ff48a154f33a07b6dc8ab5883b8,

title = "Comparison of transition-matrix sampling procedures",

abstract = "We compare the accuracy of the multicanonical procedure with that of transition-matrix models of static and dynamic communication system properties incorporating different acceptance rules. We find that for appropriate ranges of the underlying numerical parameters, algorithmically simple yet highly accurate procedures can be employed in place of the standard multicanonical sampling algorithm.",

author = "D. Yevick and M. Reimer and Bjarne Tromborg",

year = "2009",

doi = "10.1364/JOSAA.26.000184",

language = "English",

volume = "26",

pages = "184--187",

journal = "Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics Image Science and Vision",

issn = "1084-7529",

publisher = "Optica Publishing Group",

number = "1",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of transition-matrix sampling procedures

AU - Yevick, D.

AU - Reimer, M.

AU - Tromborg, Bjarne

PY - 2009

Y1 - 2009

N2 - We compare the accuracy of the multicanonical procedure with that of transition-matrix models of static and dynamic communication system properties incorporating different acceptance rules. We find that for appropriate ranges of the underlying numerical parameters, algorithmically simple yet highly accurate procedures can be employed in place of the standard multicanonical sampling algorithm.

AB - We compare the accuracy of the multicanonical procedure with that of transition-matrix models of static and dynamic communication system properties incorporating different acceptance rules. We find that for appropriate ranges of the underlying numerical parameters, algorithmically simple yet highly accurate procedures can be employed in place of the standard multicanonical sampling algorithm.

U2 - 10.1364/JOSAA.26.000184

DO - 10.1364/JOSAA.26.000184

M3 - Journal article

SN - 1084-7529

VL - 26

SP - 184

EP - 187

JO - Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics Image Science and Vision

JF - Journal of the Optical Society of America A-Optics Image Science and Vision

IS - 1

ER -

Comparison of transition-matrix sampling procedures

Abstract

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this