TY - RPRT
T1 - Comparison of load parameters for stored materials
T2 - CA-Silo Collaborative action on
AU - Munch-Andersen, J.
AU - Nielsen, J.
A2 - Nielsen, Leif Otto
PY - 1997
Y1 - 1997
N2 - The load parameters listed in the european prestandard and those
derived from the material tests conform reasonably well in many
cases. There are, however, also many cases where the agreement is
not satisfactory, especially due to larger variability of the
measured values. This yields cretainly for coal, and perhaps also
for flour. There are too few parameters determined from triaxial
tests and direct K-measurements to judge if these, presumably more
accurate tests, gives systematic different results. Where exactly
the same material has been used in different apparatus large
differences are found in several cases. The measurement of
reliable and relevant wall friction coefficients is a severe
problem. If the wall friction depends on if the normal load is
increasing or decreasing, it is the value for increasing load
which should be the relevant load parameter, but for coal and
wheat it is seen that the wall friction measured in a silo might
be significantly larger than the value obtained from shear tests.
The load parameters depend on the load level, perhaps in a way not
reflected by the internal friction angle. It is not necessarily on
the safe side to determine the parameters for a high load level.
AB - The load parameters listed in the european prestandard and those
derived from the material tests conform reasonably well in many
cases. There are, however, also many cases where the agreement is
not satisfactory, especially due to larger variability of the
measured values. This yields cretainly for coal, and perhaps also
for flour. There are too few parameters determined from triaxial
tests and direct K-measurements to judge if these, presumably more
accurate tests, gives systematic different results. Where exactly
the same material has been used in different apparatus large
differences are found in several cases. The measurement of
reliable and relevant wall friction coefficients is a severe
problem. If the wall friction depends on if the normal load is
increasing or decreasing, it is the value for increasing load
which should be the relevant load parameter, but for coal and
wheat it is seen that the wall friction measured in a silo might
be significantly larger than the value obtained from shear tests.
The load parameters depend on the load level, perhaps in a way not
reflected by the internal friction angle. It is not necessarily on
the safe side to determine the parameters for a high load level.
M3 - Report
BT - Comparison of load parameters for stored materials
ER -