Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities

Andrey Novitsky; Jakob Rosenkrantz de Lasson; Lars Hagedorn Frandsen; Philipp Gutsche; Sven Burger; Oleksiy S. Kim; Olav Breinbjerg; Aliaksandra Ivinskaya; Fengwen Wang; Ole Sigmund; Teppo Häyrynen; Andrei Lavrinenko; Jesper Mørk; Niels Gregersen

doi:10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813

Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities

Andrey Novitsky, Jakob Rosenkrantz de Lasson, Lars Hagedorn Frandsen, Philipp Gutsche, Sven Burger, Oleksiy S. Kim, Olav Breinbjerg, Aliaksandra Ivinskaya, Fengwen Wang, Ole Sigmund, Teppo Häyrynen, Andrei Lavrinenko, Jesper Mørk, Niels Gregersen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

Abstract

Five state-of-the-art computational methods are benchmarked by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Special attention is paid to the influence of the size of the computational domain. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analysing line defect cavities.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks
Number of pages	2
Publisher	IEEE
Publication date	2017
Article number	Mo.D6.3
ISBN (Print)	978-1-5386-0858-6
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813
Publication status	Published - 2017
Event	19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks - Girona, Spain Duration: 2 Jul 2017 → 6 Jul 2017

Conference

Conference	19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks
Country	Spain
City	Girona
Period	02/07/2017 → 06/07/2017

Keywords

Photonic crystal
Microcavity
Line defect cavity
Quality factor
Numerical simulations

Access to Document

10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this

Novitsky, A., de Lasson, J. R., Frandsen, L. H., Gutsche, P., Burger, S., Kim, O. S., Breinbjerg, O., Ivinskaya, A., Wang, F., Sigmund, O., Häyrynen, T., Lavrinenko, A., Mørk, J., & Gregersen, N. (2017). Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities. In Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks [Mo.D6.3 ] IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813

Novitsky, Andrey ; de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz ; Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn ; Gutsche, Philipp ; Burger, Sven ; Kim, Oleksiy S. ; Breinbjerg, Olav ; Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra ; Wang, Fengwen ; Sigmund, Ole ; Häyrynen, Teppo ; Lavrinenko, Andrei ; Mørk, Jesper ; Gregersen, Niels. / Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities. Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. IEEE, 2017.

@inproceedings{e2a2f68c672440b1a0391827e7f13d1a,

title = "Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities",

abstract = "Five state-of-the-art computational methods are benchmarked by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Special attention is paid to the influence of the size of the computational domain. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analysing line defect cavities.",

keywords = "Photonic crystal, Microcavity, Line defect cavity, Quality factor, Numerical simulations",

author = "Andrey Novitsky and {de Lasson}, {Jakob Rosenkrantz} and Frandsen, {Lars Hagedorn} and Philipp Gutsche and Sven Burger and Kim, {Oleksiy S.} and Olav Breinbjerg and Aliaksandra Ivinskaya and Fengwen Wang and Ole Sigmund and Teppo H{\"a}yrynen and Andrei Lavrinenko and Jesper M{\o}rk and Niels Gregersen",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813",

language = "English",

isbn = "978-1-5386-0858-6",

booktitle = "Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks",

publisher = "IEEE",

address = "United States",

note = "19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, ICTON 2017 ; Conference date: 02-07-2017 Through 06-07-2017",

}

Novitsky, A, de Lasson, JR, Frandsen, LH, Gutsche, P, Burger, S, Kim, OS, Breinbjerg, O, Ivinskaya, A, Wang, F , Sigmund, O, Häyrynen, T, Lavrinenko, A , Mørk, J & Gregersen, N 2017, Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities. in Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks., Mo.D6.3 , IEEE, 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks, Girona, Spain, 02/07/2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813

Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities. / Novitsky, Andrey; de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz; Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn; Gutsche, Philipp; Burger, Sven; Kim, Oleksiy S.; Breinbjerg, Olav; Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra; Wang, Fengwen ; Sigmund, Ole; Häyrynen, Teppo; Lavrinenko, Andrei ; Mørk, Jesper ; Gregersen, Niels.

Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. IEEE, 2017. Mo.D6.3 .

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities

AU - Novitsky, Andrey

AU - de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz

AU - Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn

AU - Gutsche, Philipp

AU - Burger, Sven

AU - Kim, Oleksiy S.

AU - Breinbjerg, Olav

AU - Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra

AU - Wang, Fengwen

AU - Sigmund, Ole

AU - Häyrynen, Teppo

AU - Lavrinenko, Andrei

AU - Mørk, Jesper

AU - Gregersen, Niels

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Five state-of-the-art computational methods are benchmarked by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Special attention is paid to the influence of the size of the computational domain. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analysing line defect cavities.

AB - Five state-of-the-art computational methods are benchmarked by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Special attention is paid to the influence of the size of the computational domain. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analysing line defect cavities.

KW - Photonic crystal

KW - Microcavity

KW - Line defect cavity

KW - Quality factor

KW - Numerical simulations

U2 - 10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813

DO - 10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-1-5386-0858-6

BT - Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks

PB - IEEE

T2 - 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks

Y2 - 2 July 2017 through 6 July 2017

ER -