Abstract
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks |
| Number of pages | 2 |
| Publisher | IEEE |
| Publication date | 2017 |
| Article number | Mo.D6.3 |
| ISBN (Print) | 978-1-5386-0858-6 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2017 |
| Event | 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks - Girona, Spain Duration: 2 Jul 2017 → 6 Jul 2017 |
Conference
| Conference | 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks |
|---|---|
| Country | Spain |
| City | Girona |
| Period | 02/07/2017 → 06/07/2017 |
Keywords
- Photonic crystal
- Microcavity
- Line defect cavity
- Quality factor
- Numerical simulations
Cite this
}
Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities. / Novitsky, Andrey; de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz; Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn; Gutsche, Philipp; Burger, Sven; Kim, Oleksiy S.; Breinbjerg, Olav; Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra; Wang, Fengwen; Sigmund, Ole; Häyrynen, Teppo; Lavrinenko, Andrei; Mørk, Jesper; Gregersen, Niels.
Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks. IEEE, 2017. Mo.D6.3 .Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review
TY - GEN
T1 - Comparison of Five Computational Methods for Computing Q Factors in Photonic Crystal Membrane Cavities
AU - Novitsky, Andrey
AU - de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz
AU - Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn
AU - Gutsche, Philipp
AU - Burger, Sven
AU - Kim, Oleksiy S.
AU - Breinbjerg, Olav
AU - Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra
AU - Wang, Fengwen
AU - Sigmund, Ole
AU - Häyrynen, Teppo
AU - Lavrinenko, Andrei
AU - Mørk, Jesper
AU - Gregersen, Niels
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Five state-of-the-art computational methods are benchmarked by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Special attention is paid to the influence of the size of the computational domain. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analysing line defect cavities.
AB - Five state-of-the-art computational methods are benchmarked by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Special attention is paid to the influence of the size of the computational domain. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analysing line defect cavities.
KW - Photonic crystal
KW - Microcavity
KW - Line defect cavity
KW - Quality factor
KW - Numerical simulations
U2 - 10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813
DO - 10.1109/ICTON.2017.8024813
M3 - Article in proceedings
SN - 978-1-5386-0858-6
BT - Proceedings of 19th International Conference on Transparent Optical Networks
PB - IEEE
ER -