Abstract
To evaluate the efficiency of different recovery methods of viral RNA from bottled water, a comparison was made of 2 positively and 2 negatively charged membranes that were used for absorbing and releasing HAV virus particles during the filtration of viral spiked bottled water. All the 4 membranes, regardless of charge and pore size, had low level viral recovery. The results show that a considerable number of the virus particles passed through the pores of the membranes instead of being trapped by the electrostatic charges. Two different procedures were then compared using 1.5 L polyethylene bottles spiked with 10-fold serial dilutions of HAV and FCV. The first procedure included an ultrafiltration-based method followed by MiniMag RNA extraction, and the second an ultracentrifugation-based method followed by RNA extraction using QIAamp® viral RNA mini kit. The ultracentrifugation-based method resulted in a better recovery of HAV and FCV when compared to the ultrafiltration-based method.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Journal | Journal of Virological Methods |
| Volume | 165 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| Pages (from-to) | 57-63 |
| ISSN | 0166-0934 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2010 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- Ultrafiltration
- Concentration methods
- Bottled water
- Calicivirus
- Hepatitis A
- Ultracentrifugation
- Real Time-PCR
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Comparison of different concentration methods for the detection of hepatitis A virus and calicivirus from bottled natural mineral waters'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver