Abstract
To evaluate the efficiency of different recovery methods of viral RNA from bottled water, a comparison was made of 2 positively and 2 negatively charged membranes that were used for absorbing and releasing HAV virus particles during the filtration of viral spiked bottled water. All the 4 membranes, regardless of charge and pore size, had low level viral recovery. The results show that a considerable number of the virus particles passed through the pores of the membranes instead of being trapped by the electrostatic charges. Two different procedures were then compared using 1.5 L polyethylene bottles spiked with 10-fold serial dilutions of HAV and FCV. The first procedure included an ultrafiltration-based method followed by MiniMag RNA extraction, and the second an ultracentrifugation-based method followed by RNA extraction using QIAamp® viral RNA mini kit. The ultracentrifugation-based method resulted in a better recovery of HAV and FCV when compared to the ultrafiltration-based method.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Journal of Virological Methods |
Volume | 165 |
Issue number | 1 |
Pages (from-to) | 57-63 |
ISSN | 0166-0934 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2010 |
Keywords
- Ultrafiltration
- Concentration methods
- Bottled water
- Calicivirus
- Hepatitis A
- Ultracentrifugation
- Real Time-PCR