Comparison Between Stress Obtained by Numerical Analysis and In-Situ Measurements on a Flexible Pipe Subjected to In-Plane Bending Test

Troels Vestergaard Lukassen, Kristian Glejbøl, Anders Lyckegaard, Christian Berggreen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

To predict the lifetime and long-term properties of tensile armour wires in a dynamically loaded pipe, it is essential to have a tool which allows detailed prediction of the stress variations in the tensile armour wires during global pipe loading. Furthermore, detailed understanding of the stress variations will allow for performance optimization of the armour layers. To study the detailed stress variations in flexible pipes during dynamic loading, a comprehensive three-dimensional implicit nonlinear finite element model has been developed. The predicted numerical stress variations will be compared to stress patterns obtained during in-situ OMS measurements carried out during an actual experimental inplane bending test. The study showed a good correlation between the stress variation predicted with the finite element model and the measured stress variation.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016)
Number of pages8
Volume5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems
PublisherAmerican Society of Mechanical Engineers
Publication date2016
Article numberOMAE2016-55060
ISBN (Electronic)978-0-7918-4996-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2016
EventASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2016) - Busan, Korea, Republic of
Duration: 19 Jun 201624 Jun 2016

Conference

ConferenceASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2016)
CountryKorea, Republic of
CityBusan
Period19/06/201624/06/2016

Cite this

Vestergaard Lukassen, T., Glejbøl, K., Lyckegaard, A., & Berggreen, C. (2016). Comparison Between Stress Obtained by Numerical Analysis and In-Situ Measurements on a Flexible Pipe Subjected to In-Plane Bending Test. In Proceedings of the ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016) (Vol. 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems). [OMAE2016-55060] American Society of Mechanical Engineers. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-55060
Vestergaard Lukassen, Troels ; Glejbøl, Kristian ; Lyckegaard, Anders ; Berggreen, Christian. / Comparison Between Stress Obtained by Numerical Analysis and In-Situ Measurements on a Flexible Pipe Subjected to In-Plane Bending Test. Proceedings of the ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016). Vol. 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016.
@inproceedings{7d429b3dfa094a6f8f0c5117040e8f7d,
title = "Comparison Between Stress Obtained by Numerical Analysis and In-Situ Measurements on a Flexible Pipe Subjected to In-Plane Bending Test",
abstract = "To predict the lifetime and long-term properties of tensile armour wires in a dynamically loaded pipe, it is essential to have a tool which allows detailed prediction of the stress variations in the tensile armour wires during global pipe loading. Furthermore, detailed understanding of the stress variations will allow for performance optimization of the armour layers. To study the detailed stress variations in flexible pipes during dynamic loading, a comprehensive three-dimensional implicit nonlinear finite element model has been developed. The predicted numerical stress variations will be compared to stress patterns obtained during in-situ OMS measurements carried out during an actual experimental inplane bending test. The study showed a good correlation between the stress variation predicted with the finite element model and the measured stress variation.",
author = "{Vestergaard Lukassen}, Troels and Kristian Glejb{\o}l and Anders Lyckegaard and Christian Berggreen",
year = "2016",
doi = "10.1115/OMAE2016-55060",
language = "English",
volume = "5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016)",
publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers",
address = "United States",

}

Vestergaard Lukassen, T, Glejbøl, K, Lyckegaard, A & Berggreen, C 2016, Comparison Between Stress Obtained by Numerical Analysis and In-Situ Measurements on a Flexible Pipe Subjected to In-Plane Bending Test. in Proceedings of the ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016). vol. 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems, OMAE2016-55060, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, ASME 2016 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE2016), Busan, Korea, Republic of, 19/06/2016. https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-55060

Comparison Between Stress Obtained by Numerical Analysis and In-Situ Measurements on a Flexible Pipe Subjected to In-Plane Bending Test. / Vestergaard Lukassen, Troels; Glejbøl, Kristian ; Lyckegaard, Anders; Berggreen, Christian.

Proceedings of the ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016). Vol. 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2016. OMAE2016-55060.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison Between Stress Obtained by Numerical Analysis and In-Situ Measurements on a Flexible Pipe Subjected to In-Plane Bending Test

AU - Vestergaard Lukassen, Troels

AU - Glejbøl, Kristian

AU - Lyckegaard, Anders

AU - Berggreen, Christian

PY - 2016

Y1 - 2016

N2 - To predict the lifetime and long-term properties of tensile armour wires in a dynamically loaded pipe, it is essential to have a tool which allows detailed prediction of the stress variations in the tensile armour wires during global pipe loading. Furthermore, detailed understanding of the stress variations will allow for performance optimization of the armour layers. To study the detailed stress variations in flexible pipes during dynamic loading, a comprehensive three-dimensional implicit nonlinear finite element model has been developed. The predicted numerical stress variations will be compared to stress patterns obtained during in-situ OMS measurements carried out during an actual experimental inplane bending test. The study showed a good correlation between the stress variation predicted with the finite element model and the measured stress variation.

AB - To predict the lifetime and long-term properties of tensile armour wires in a dynamically loaded pipe, it is essential to have a tool which allows detailed prediction of the stress variations in the tensile armour wires during global pipe loading. Furthermore, detailed understanding of the stress variations will allow for performance optimization of the armour layers. To study the detailed stress variations in flexible pipes during dynamic loading, a comprehensive three-dimensional implicit nonlinear finite element model has been developed. The predicted numerical stress variations will be compared to stress patterns obtained during in-situ OMS measurements carried out during an actual experimental inplane bending test. The study showed a good correlation between the stress variation predicted with the finite element model and the measured stress variation.

U2 - 10.1115/OMAE2016-55060

DO - 10.1115/OMAE2016-55060

M3 - Article in proceedings

VL - 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems

BT - Proceedings of the ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016)

PB - American Society of Mechanical Engineers

ER -

Vestergaard Lukassen T, Glejbøl K, Lyckegaard A, Berggreen C. Comparison Between Stress Obtained by Numerical Analysis and In-Situ Measurements on a Flexible Pipe Subjected to In-Plane Bending Test. In Proceedings of the ASME 35th International Conference on Ocean, Offshore and Arctic Engineering (OMAE 2016). Vol. 5: Pipelines, Risers, and Subsea Systems. American Society of Mechanical Engineers. 2016. OMAE2016-55060 https://doi.org/10.1115/OMAE2016-55060