Comparison between AGC and a tuningless LFC approach based on direct observation of DERs

Alexander Maria Prostejovsky, Mattia Marinelli

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Automatic Generation Control (AGC) used in secondary frequency control requires manual tuning to maintain a balance between reaction speed and stability. This task becomes increasingly difficult due to the rising number of inverter-coupled devices and High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) links, and the resulting reduction of available inertia. In this paper, we propose a tuningless Load-Frequency Control (LFC) approach able to cope with the changing dynamics of electric power grids. Harnessing the possibilities of modern monitoring and communication means, the so-called Direct Load-Frequency Control (DLFC) employs two concurrently operating processes: a power matching stage responsible for secondary power adjustment using directly observed area imbalances; and a frequency control stage that adjusts primary reserves' frequency setpoints in a systematic manner. As opposed to the AGC, the DLFC does not require an integrator to mitigate frequency deviations. The only free parameter is the secondary control interval, from which all other parameters are derived. Small-signal stability investigations show that the DLFC exhibits 40 dB falloff of steady-state deviations versus the AGC's 20 dB. Simulations on the non-linear singlearea system confirm the DLFC's response speed and stability advantage.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference
Number of pages6
PublisherIEEE
Publication date2017
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017
Event52nd International Universities' Power Engineering Conference - Heraklion, Heraklion, Greece
Duration: 28 Aug 201731 Aug 2017
Conference number: 52
http://www.upec2017.com/
http://www.upec2017.com/

Conference

Conference52nd International Universities' Power Engineering Conference
Number52
LocationHeraklion
CountryGreece
CityHeraklion
Period28/08/201731/08/2017
Internet address
Series2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (upec)

Keywords

  • Automatic Generation Control
  • Distributed Systems
  • Load Frequency Control
  • Low Inertia Systems
  • Power Quality
  • Renewable Energy Sources

Cite this

Prostejovsky, A. M., & Marinelli, M. (2017). Comparison between AGC and a tuningless LFC approach based on direct observation of DERs. In Proceedings of the 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference IEEE. 2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (upec) https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231931
Prostejovsky, Alexander Maria ; Marinelli, Mattia. / Comparison between AGC and a tuningless LFC approach based on direct observation of DERs. Proceedings of the 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference. IEEE, 2017. (2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (upec)).
@inproceedings{fe385b4c68b849a4bc90c6bb8c879223,
title = "Comparison between AGC and a tuningless LFC approach based on direct observation of DERs",
abstract = "Automatic Generation Control (AGC) used in secondary frequency control requires manual tuning to maintain a balance between reaction speed and stability. This task becomes increasingly difficult due to the rising number of inverter-coupled devices and High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) links, and the resulting reduction of available inertia. In this paper, we propose a tuningless Load-Frequency Control (LFC) approach able to cope with the changing dynamics of electric power grids. Harnessing the possibilities of modern monitoring and communication means, the so-called Direct Load-Frequency Control (DLFC) employs two concurrently operating processes: a power matching stage responsible for secondary power adjustment using directly observed area imbalances; and a frequency control stage that adjusts primary reserves' frequency setpoints in a systematic manner. As opposed to the AGC, the DLFC does not require an integrator to mitigate frequency deviations. The only free parameter is the secondary control interval, from which all other parameters are derived. Small-signal stability investigations show that the DLFC exhibits 40 dB falloff of steady-state deviations versus the AGC's 20 dB. Simulations on the non-linear singlearea system confirm the DLFC's response speed and stability advantage.",
keywords = "Automatic Generation Control, Distributed Systems, Load Frequency Control, Low Inertia Systems, Power Quality, Renewable Energy Sources",
author = "Prostejovsky, {Alexander Maria} and Mattia Marinelli",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231931",
language = "English",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference",
publisher = "IEEE",
address = "United States",

}

Prostejovsky, AM & Marinelli, M 2017, Comparison between AGC and a tuningless LFC approach based on direct observation of DERs. in Proceedings of the 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference. IEEE, 2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (upec), 52nd International Universities' Power Engineering Conference, Heraklion, Greece, 28/08/2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231931

Comparison between AGC and a tuningless LFC approach based on direct observation of DERs. / Prostejovsky, Alexander Maria; Marinelli, Mattia.

Proceedings of the 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference. IEEE, 2017. (2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (upec)).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Comparison between AGC and a tuningless LFC approach based on direct observation of DERs

AU - Prostejovsky, Alexander Maria

AU - Marinelli, Mattia

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - Automatic Generation Control (AGC) used in secondary frequency control requires manual tuning to maintain a balance between reaction speed and stability. This task becomes increasingly difficult due to the rising number of inverter-coupled devices and High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) links, and the resulting reduction of available inertia. In this paper, we propose a tuningless Load-Frequency Control (LFC) approach able to cope with the changing dynamics of electric power grids. Harnessing the possibilities of modern monitoring and communication means, the so-called Direct Load-Frequency Control (DLFC) employs two concurrently operating processes: a power matching stage responsible for secondary power adjustment using directly observed area imbalances; and a frequency control stage that adjusts primary reserves' frequency setpoints in a systematic manner. As opposed to the AGC, the DLFC does not require an integrator to mitigate frequency deviations. The only free parameter is the secondary control interval, from which all other parameters are derived. Small-signal stability investigations show that the DLFC exhibits 40 dB falloff of steady-state deviations versus the AGC's 20 dB. Simulations on the non-linear singlearea system confirm the DLFC's response speed and stability advantage.

AB - Automatic Generation Control (AGC) used in secondary frequency control requires manual tuning to maintain a balance between reaction speed and stability. This task becomes increasingly difficult due to the rising number of inverter-coupled devices and High-Voltage Direct Current (HVDC) links, and the resulting reduction of available inertia. In this paper, we propose a tuningless Load-Frequency Control (LFC) approach able to cope with the changing dynamics of electric power grids. Harnessing the possibilities of modern monitoring and communication means, the so-called Direct Load-Frequency Control (DLFC) employs two concurrently operating processes: a power matching stage responsible for secondary power adjustment using directly observed area imbalances; and a frequency control stage that adjusts primary reserves' frequency setpoints in a systematic manner. As opposed to the AGC, the DLFC does not require an integrator to mitigate frequency deviations. The only free parameter is the secondary control interval, from which all other parameters are derived. Small-signal stability investigations show that the DLFC exhibits 40 dB falloff of steady-state deviations versus the AGC's 20 dB. Simulations on the non-linear singlearea system confirm the DLFC's response speed and stability advantage.

KW - Automatic Generation Control

KW - Distributed Systems

KW - Load Frequency Control

KW - Low Inertia Systems

KW - Power Quality

KW - Renewable Energy Sources

U2 - 10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231931

DO - 10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231931

M3 - Article in proceedings

BT - Proceedings of the 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference

PB - IEEE

ER -

Prostejovsky AM, Marinelli M. Comparison between AGC and a tuningless LFC approach based on direct observation of DERs. In Proceedings of the 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference. IEEE. 2017. (2017 52nd International Universities Power Engineering Conference (upec)). https://doi.org/10.1109/UPEC.2017.8231931