Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies-Methodological considerations

Joana Leitao, Axel Thielscher, Johannes Tuennerhoff, Uta Noppeney

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

459 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Neglect and hemianopia are two neuropsychological syndromes that are associated with reduced awareness for visual signals in patients' contralesional hemifield. They offer the unique possibility to dissociate the contributions of retino-geniculate and retino-colliculo circuitries in visual perception. Yet, insights from patient fMRI studies are limited by heterogeneity in lesion location and extent, long-term functional reorganization and behavioural compensation after stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has therefore been proposed as a complementary method to investigate the effect of transient perturbations on functional brain organization. This concurrent TMS-fMRI study applied TMS perturbation to occipital and parietal cortices with the aim to 'mimick' neglect and hemianopia. Based on the challenges and interpretational limitations of our own study we aim to provide tutorial guidance on how future studies should compare TMS to primary sensory and association areas that are governed by distinct computational principles, neural dynamics and functional architecture.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere0181438
JournalP L o S One
Volume12
Issue number8
Number of pages20
ISSN1932-6203
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Bibliographical note

Copyright: © 2017 Leitão et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided by the original author and source are credited.

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies-Methodological considerations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this