Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming

Sonal Keshwani, Torben Anker Lenau, Saeema Ahmed-Kristensen, Amaresh Chakrabarti

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

135 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

This research aims to understand the significance of biological-analogies in fostering novelty by comparing biological-analogies with other design methods for idea generation. Among other design methods, brainstorming was chosen here as benchmark. Four studies were conducted to compare: (i) the levels of abstraction at which concepts were ideated using biological inspiration (represented using biocards) with that using traditional brainstorming; and (ii) the novelty of concepts produced by using these two design methods. Concepts produced in these studies were evaluated for levels of abstraction at which they were ideated, average novelty, and proportion of high-novelty concepts. Results suggest that concepts generated using biocards were ideated at higher abstraction levels than those using brainstorming, but neither were at the highest abstraction levels. The average novelty of concepts produced using biocards was found to be greater than that using brainstorming; however, no statistically significant difference was found in the proportion of high-novelty concepts. We suspect the lack of biological knowledge and cultural difference among the subjects involved in our studies as the two reasons behind the results. The results demonstrate that the design methods substantially influence the novelty of concepts generated, while indicating the need for better training in effective use of biological-analogies.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Engineering Design
Volume28
Issue number10-12
Pages (from-to)654–680
ISSN0954-4828
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Biologically inspired design
  • Conceptual design
  • Creative-design
  • Creativity
  • Design methods

Cite this

Keshwani, Sonal ; Lenau, Torben Anker ; Ahmed-Kristensen, Saeema ; Chakrabarti, Amaresh. / Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming. In: Journal of Engineering Design. 2017 ; Vol. 28, No. 10-12. pp. 654–680.
@article{006adcab8bb64bd1a4676f6eea5924cb,
title = "Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming",
abstract = "This research aims to understand the significance of biological-analogies in fostering novelty by comparing biological-analogies with other design methods for idea generation. Among other design methods, brainstorming was chosen here as benchmark. Four studies were conducted to compare: (i) the levels of abstraction at which concepts were ideated using biological inspiration (represented using biocards) with that using traditional brainstorming; and (ii) the novelty of concepts produced by using these two design methods. Concepts produced in these studies were evaluated for levels of abstraction at which they were ideated, average novelty, and proportion of high-novelty concepts. Results suggest that concepts generated using biocards were ideated at higher abstraction levels than those using brainstorming, but neither were at the highest abstraction levels. The average novelty of concepts produced using biocards was found to be greater than that using brainstorming; however, no statistically significant difference was found in the proportion of high-novelty concepts. We suspect the lack of biological knowledge and cultural difference among the subjects involved in our studies as the two reasons behind the results. The results demonstrate that the design methods substantially influence the novelty of concepts generated, while indicating the need for better training in effective use of biological-analogies.",
keywords = "Biologically inspired design, Conceptual design, Creative-design, Creativity, Design methods",
author = "Sonal Keshwani and Lenau, {Torben Anker} and Saeema Ahmed-Kristensen and Amaresh Chakrabarti",
year = "2017",
doi = "10.1080/09544828.2017.1393504",
language = "English",
volume = "28",
pages = "654–680",
journal = "Journal of Engineering Design",
issn = "0954-4828",
publisher = "CRC Press/Balkema",
number = "10-12",

}

Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming. / Keshwani, Sonal; Lenau, Torben Anker; Ahmed-Kristensen, Saeema; Chakrabarti, Amaresh.

In: Journal of Engineering Design, Vol. 28, No. 10-12, 2017, p. 654–680.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparing novelty of designs from biological-inspiration with those from brainstorming

AU - Keshwani, Sonal

AU - Lenau, Torben Anker

AU - Ahmed-Kristensen, Saeema

AU - Chakrabarti, Amaresh

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - This research aims to understand the significance of biological-analogies in fostering novelty by comparing biological-analogies with other design methods for idea generation. Among other design methods, brainstorming was chosen here as benchmark. Four studies were conducted to compare: (i) the levels of abstraction at which concepts were ideated using biological inspiration (represented using biocards) with that using traditional brainstorming; and (ii) the novelty of concepts produced by using these two design methods. Concepts produced in these studies were evaluated for levels of abstraction at which they were ideated, average novelty, and proportion of high-novelty concepts. Results suggest that concepts generated using biocards were ideated at higher abstraction levels than those using brainstorming, but neither were at the highest abstraction levels. The average novelty of concepts produced using biocards was found to be greater than that using brainstorming; however, no statistically significant difference was found in the proportion of high-novelty concepts. We suspect the lack of biological knowledge and cultural difference among the subjects involved in our studies as the two reasons behind the results. The results demonstrate that the design methods substantially influence the novelty of concepts generated, while indicating the need for better training in effective use of biological-analogies.

AB - This research aims to understand the significance of biological-analogies in fostering novelty by comparing biological-analogies with other design methods for idea generation. Among other design methods, brainstorming was chosen here as benchmark. Four studies were conducted to compare: (i) the levels of abstraction at which concepts were ideated using biological inspiration (represented using biocards) with that using traditional brainstorming; and (ii) the novelty of concepts produced by using these two design methods. Concepts produced in these studies were evaluated for levels of abstraction at which they were ideated, average novelty, and proportion of high-novelty concepts. Results suggest that concepts generated using biocards were ideated at higher abstraction levels than those using brainstorming, but neither were at the highest abstraction levels. The average novelty of concepts produced using biocards was found to be greater than that using brainstorming; however, no statistically significant difference was found in the proportion of high-novelty concepts. We suspect the lack of biological knowledge and cultural difference among the subjects involved in our studies as the two reasons behind the results. The results demonstrate that the design methods substantially influence the novelty of concepts generated, while indicating the need for better training in effective use of biological-analogies.

KW - Biologically inspired design

KW - Conceptual design

KW - Creative-design

KW - Creativity

KW - Design methods

U2 - 10.1080/09544828.2017.1393504

DO - 10.1080/09544828.2017.1393504

M3 - Journal article

VL - 28

SP - 654

EP - 680

JO - Journal of Engineering Design

JF - Journal of Engineering Design

SN - 0954-4828

IS - 10-12

ER -