TY - JOUR
T1 - Community estimate of global glacier mass changes from 2000 to 2023
AU - The GlaMBIE Team
AU - Zemp, Michael
AU - Jakob, Livia
AU - Dussaillant, Inés
AU - Nussbaumer, Samuel U.
AU - Gourmelen, Noel
AU - Dubber, Sophie
AU - A, Geruo
AU - Abdullahi, Sahra
AU - Andreassen, Liss Marie
AU - Berthier, Etienne
AU - Bhattacharya, Atanu
AU - Blazquez, Alejandro
AU - Boehm Vock, Laura F.
AU - Bolch, Tobias
AU - Box, Jason
AU - Braun, Matthias H.
AU - Brun, Fanny
AU - Cicero, Eric
AU - Colgan, William
AU - Eckert, Nicolas
AU - Farinotti, Daniel
AU - Florentine, Caitlyn
AU - Floricioiu, Dana
AU - Gardner, Alex
AU - Harig, Christopher
AU - Hassan, Javed
AU - Hugonnet, Romain
AU - Huss, Matthias
AU - Jóhannesson, Tómas
AU - Liang, Chia-Chun Angela
AU - Ke, Chang-Qing
AU - Khan, Shfaqat Abbas
AU - King, Owen
AU - Kneib, Marin
AU - Krieger, Lukas
AU - Maussion, Fabien
AU - Mattea, Enrico
AU - McNabb, Robert
AU - Menounos, Brian
AU - Miles, Evan
AU - Moholdt, Geir
AU - Nilsson, Johan
AU - Pálsson, Finnur
AU - Pfeffer, Julia
AU - Piermattei, Livia
AU - Plummer, Stephen
AU - Richter, Andreas
AU - Sasgen, Ingo
AU - Schuster, Lilian
AU - Seehaus, Thorsten
AU - Shen, Xiaoyi
AU - Sommer, Christian
AU - Sutterley, Tyler
AU - Treichler, Désirée
AU - Velicogna, Isabella
AU - Wouters, Bert
AU - Zekollari, Harry
AU - Zheng, Whyjay
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Glaciers are indicators of ongoing anthropogenic climate change1. Their melting leads to increased local geohazards2, and impacts marine3 and terrestrial4,5 ecosystems, regional freshwater resources6, and both global water and energy cycles7,8. Together with the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, glaciers are essential drivers of present9,10 and future11–13 sea-level rise. Previous assessments of global glacier mass changes have been hampered by spatial and temporal limitations and the heterogeneity of existing data series14–16. Here we show in an intercomparison exercise that glaciers worldwide lost 273 ± 16 gigatonnes in mass annually from 2000 to 2023, with an increase of 36 ± 10% from the first (2000–2011) to the second (2012–2023) half of the period. Since 2000, glaciers have lost between 2% and 39% of their ice regionally and about 5% globally. Glacier mass loss is about 18% larger than the loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet and more than twice that from the Antarctic Ice Sheet17. Our results arise from a scientific community effort to collect, homogenize, combine and analyse glacier mass changes from in situ and remote-sensing observations. Although our estimates are in agreement with findings from previous assessments14–16 at a global scale, we found some large regional deviations owing to systematic differences among observation methods. Our results provide a refined baseline for better understanding observational differences and for calibrating model ensembles12,16,18, which will help to narrow projection uncertainty for the twenty-first century11,12,18.
AB - Glaciers are indicators of ongoing anthropogenic climate change1. Their melting leads to increased local geohazards2, and impacts marine3 and terrestrial4,5 ecosystems, regional freshwater resources6, and both global water and energy cycles7,8. Together with the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets, glaciers are essential drivers of present9,10 and future11–13 sea-level rise. Previous assessments of global glacier mass changes have been hampered by spatial and temporal limitations and the heterogeneity of existing data series14–16. Here we show in an intercomparison exercise that glaciers worldwide lost 273 ± 16 gigatonnes in mass annually from 2000 to 2023, with an increase of 36 ± 10% from the first (2000–2011) to the second (2012–2023) half of the period. Since 2000, glaciers have lost between 2% and 39% of their ice regionally and about 5% globally. Glacier mass loss is about 18% larger than the loss from the Greenland Ice Sheet and more than twice that from the Antarctic Ice Sheet17. Our results arise from a scientific community effort to collect, homogenize, combine and analyse glacier mass changes from in situ and remote-sensing observations. Although our estimates are in agreement with findings from previous assessments14–16 at a global scale, we found some large regional deviations owing to systematic differences among observation methods. Our results provide a refined baseline for better understanding observational differences and for calibrating model ensembles12,16,18, which will help to narrow projection uncertainty for the twenty-first century11,12,18.
U2 - 10.1038/s41586-024-08545-z
DO - 10.1038/s41586-024-08545-z
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 39972143
SN - 1476-4687
JO - Nature
JF - Nature
ER -