Comments on ‘Improving the speed of decimal division’

    Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review


    For original article see Kaivani, et al., ibid, vol. 5, pp. 393-404 (2011). Lang and Nannarelli comment on the paper of Kaivani, et al., which reported a proposed unit ~46% faster than the unit from their study. Lang and Nannarelli show in this comment that the evaluation done by Kaivani, et al. is based on wrong assumptions and the results of the comparison are erroneous.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalI E T Computers and Digital Techniques
    Issue number6
    Pages (from-to)370-371
    Publication statusPublished - 2012


    Dive into the research topics of 'Comments on ‘Improving the speed of decimal division’'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this