Comments on ‘Improving the speed of decimal division’

T. Lang; Alberto Nannarelli

doi:10.1049/iet-cdt.2012.0090

Comments on ‘Improving the speed of decimal division’

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › Research › peer-review

Abstract

For original article see Kaivani, et al., ibid, vol. 5, pp. 393-404 (2011). Lang and Nannarelli comment on the paper of Kaivani, et al., which reported a proposed unit ~46% faster than the unit from their study. Lang and Nannarelli show in this comment that the evaluation done by Kaivani, et al. is based on wrong assumptions and the results of the comparison are erroneous.

Original language	English
Journal	I E T Computers and Digital Techniques
Volume	6
Issue number	6
Pages (from-to)	370-371
ISSN	1751-8601
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-cdt.2012.0090
Publication status	Published - 2012

Access to Document

10.1049/iet-cdt.2012.0090

SFX availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{6d787860ba4e4335828ccbd0de35705a,

title = "Comments on {\textquoteleft}Improving the speed of decimal division{\textquoteright}",

abstract = "For original article see Kaivani, et al., ibid, vol. 5, pp. 393-404 (2011). Lang and Nannarelli comment on the paper of Kaivani, et al., which reported a proposed unit ~46% faster than the unit from their study. Lang and Nannarelli show in this comment that the evaluation done by Kaivani, et al. is based on wrong assumptions and the results of the comparison are erroneous.",

author = "T. Lang and Alberto Nannarelli",

year = "2012",

doi = "10.1049/iet-cdt.2012.0090",

language = "English",

volume = "6",

pages = "370--371 ",

journal = "I E T Computers and Digital Techniques",

issn = "1751-8601",

publisher = "The/Institution of Engineering and Technology",

number = "6",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comments on ‘Improving the speed of decimal division’

AU - Lang, T.

AU - Nannarelli, Alberto

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - For original article see Kaivani, et al., ibid, vol. 5, pp. 393-404 (2011). Lang and Nannarelli comment on the paper of Kaivani, et al., which reported a proposed unit ~46% faster than the unit from their study. Lang and Nannarelli show in this comment that the evaluation done by Kaivani, et al. is based on wrong assumptions and the results of the comparison are erroneous.

AB - For original article see Kaivani, et al., ibid, vol. 5, pp. 393-404 (2011). Lang and Nannarelli comment on the paper of Kaivani, et al., which reported a proposed unit ~46% faster than the unit from their study. Lang and Nannarelli show in this comment that the evaluation done by Kaivani, et al. is based on wrong assumptions and the results of the comparison are erroneous.

U2 - 10.1049/iet-cdt.2012.0090

DO - 10.1049/iet-cdt.2012.0090

M3 - Comment/debate

VL - 6

SP - 370

EP - 371

JO - I E T Computers and Digital Techniques

JF - I E T Computers and Digital Techniques

SN - 1751-8601

IS - 6

ER -