TY - JOUR
T1 - Comfort-based control for mixed-mode buildings
AU - Joaquín Aguilera, José
AU - Bogatu, Dragos-Ioan
AU - Berk Kazanci, Ongun
AU - Angelopoulos, Charalampos
AU - Coakley, Daniel
AU - Olesen, Bjarne W.
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - International thermal comfort standards are applicable for the design and operation of either mechanically cooled or naturally cooled buildings and limited guidance is given for mixed-mode buildings. In this study, a control framework for mixed-mode buildings was defined based on the adaptive comfort model and PMV-PPD method. The proposed framework was tested using a simulation-based analysis of a central module of an office building. The results were compared with a mechanically cooled building. The objective was to characterize how to control mixed-mode buildings optimally, regarding both energy use and thermal comfort. Five locations were considered: Copenhagen - DK, Edinburgh - UK, Palermo - IT, Tokyo - JPN, and Zurich - CH. The mixed-mode control strategy had a primary energy use between 12 and 51 % lower than the mechanically cooled case. In this context, using the upper limit of the adaptive comfort zone as cooling set point rather than the upper limit of the PMV-based comfort zone showed nearly 20 % more energy savings and fewer switchovers between operation modes. Night cooling led to lower operative temperatures and fewer switchovers between operation modes as well as additional energy savings of 10 % only in Palermo. The results show that a mixed-mode building operated based on the adaptive comfort criteria can have a large reduction of energy use without compromising thermal comfort or indoor air quality, compared to a mechanically cooled building.
AB - International thermal comfort standards are applicable for the design and operation of either mechanically cooled or naturally cooled buildings and limited guidance is given for mixed-mode buildings. In this study, a control framework for mixed-mode buildings was defined based on the adaptive comfort model and PMV-PPD method. The proposed framework was tested using a simulation-based analysis of a central module of an office building. The results were compared with a mechanically cooled building. The objective was to characterize how to control mixed-mode buildings optimally, regarding both energy use and thermal comfort. Five locations were considered: Copenhagen - DK, Edinburgh - UK, Palermo - IT, Tokyo - JPN, and Zurich - CH. The mixed-mode control strategy had a primary energy use between 12 and 51 % lower than the mechanically cooled case. In this context, using the upper limit of the adaptive comfort zone as cooling set point rather than the upper limit of the PMV-based comfort zone showed nearly 20 % more energy savings and fewer switchovers between operation modes. Night cooling led to lower operative temperatures and fewer switchovers between operation modes as well as additional energy savings of 10 % only in Palermo. The results show that a mixed-mode building operated based on the adaptive comfort criteria can have a large reduction of energy use without compromising thermal comfort or indoor air quality, compared to a mechanically cooled building.
KW - Mixed-mode
KW - Adaptive comfort model
KW - HVAC control
KW - Thermal comfort
KW - Mechanical cooling
KW - Night cooling
U2 - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111465
DO - 10.1016/j.enbuild.2021.111465
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0378-7788
VL - 252
JO - Energy and Buildings
JF - Energy and Buildings
M1 - 111465
ER -