Collective ‘action recipes’ in a circular economy – On waste and resource management frameworks and their role in collective change

Fenna Blomsma*

*Corresponding author for this work

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    510 Downloads (Orbit)

    Abstract

    This paper shows how to constructively engage with waste and resource management frameworks, by clarifying their role in the societal discourse on waste and resources, providing insight into their step-based structure, and how they draw on different definitions of ‘waste’ and ‘resource.’ Through use of the concepts of ‘frame,’ ‘collective action frame’ and ‘logics,’ a language and conceptual toolbox is made available that facilitates a constructive debate around such frameworks. Ten waste and resource management frameworks are included here, among which are the five frameworks that are part of the synthesis of the Ellen MacArthur Foundation's Circular Economy framework: Cradle-to-Cradle™ by Braungart and McDonough, the Performance Economy by Walter Stahel, the Blue Economy by Gunter Pauli, Regenerative Design by John Lyle and the Industrial Symbiosis framework. A case is made for the careful consideration, creation, use and further development of such frameworks and directions are provided for the further development of the CE concept into a robust concept.

    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Cleaner Production
    Volume199
    Pages (from-to)969-982
    ISSN0959-6526
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2018

    Keywords

    • Circular economy
    • Circular strategies
    • Closed-loop
    • Collective action frame
    • Resource productivity
    • Societal change
    • Waste

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Collective ‘action recipes’ in a circular economy – On waste and resource management frameworks and their role in collective change'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this