Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Clinical translation of 3D-printed patient-specific bone implants: a consensus statement

  • Markus Laubach*
  • , Giles Michael Cheers
  • , Tina Frankenbach-Désor
  • , Lucas Philipp Weimer
  • , Heiko Baumgartner
  • , Wolfgang Böcker
  • , Rainer Burgkart
  • , Gianluca Cidonio
  • , Matteo D'Este
  • , Ulrich Dirnagl
  • , Natascha Drude
  • , Jörg Eschweiler
  • , Michael Friebe
  • , Bergita Ganse
  • , Hanna Hartmann
  • , Frank Hildebrand
  • , Christoph Hoog Antink
  • , MinJoo Kim
  • , Ulrich Kneser
  • , Witold Łojkowski
  • Gerd Marmitt, Susanne Mayer-Wagner, Maximilian Praster, Nils Reimers, Katja Schenke-Layland, Arndt Peter Schulz, Nicolai Spicher, Christian Stoppe, Ulf Toelch, Martijn van Griensven, Esther Wehrle, Sarah Weschke, Boris Michael Holzapfel, Dietmar Werner Hutmacher
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich
  • University of Tübingen
  • Technical University of Munich
  • University of Rome La Sapienza
  • AO Research Institute Davos
  • Berlin Institute of Health
  • Charité – Universitätsmedizin Berlin
  • Otto von Guericke University Magdeburg
  • Saarland University
  • RWTH Aachen University
  • Technische Universität Darmstadt
  • Heidelberg University 
  • Polish Academy of Sciences
  • Mannheim University of Applied Sciences
  • Stryker Trauma GmbH
  • Eberhard-Karls-Universität Tübingen
  • University of Lübeck
  • Maastricht University
  • Queensland University of Technology

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

12 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

Background: Extensive defects in long bones, resulting from trauma, disease, or other etiologies, impose significant morbidity on patients and may necessitate amputation, long-term disability, or premature mortality. While 3D-printed, patient-specific implants offer promising regenerative solutions, their clinical implementation remains hindered by regulatory challenges, lack of standardized guidelines, and gaps in translational research. Addressing these barriers is critical to improving patient outcomes and optimizing healthcare resource utilization.

Materials and methods: A multidisciplinary group of 29 experts-including clinicians (surgeons, anesthesiologists), biomaterial scientists, biomedical engineers, legal/regulatory professionals, health economists, meta-researchers, artificial intelligence experts, trialists, and biomaterial industry representatives-convened for the Consensus Meeting on 3D-printed patient-specific Bone Implants (CoMBI). Preceding the meeting, key questions were discussed in individual interviews and categorized into fundamental research, preclinical studies, and clinical trials & implementation (CoMBI themes). Experts presented on each theme, followed by structured discussions. Statements were synthesized, iteratively refined, and validated through open review.

Results: The consensus meeting resulted in 20 key statements addressing the CoMBI themes, outlining a framework to advance regulatory compliance and facilitate the clinical adoption of 3D-printed implants. Key statements include the need for harmonized regulatory pathways, clear guidelines on preclinical validation, and innovative trial designs tailored to complex, patient-specific implants. Strengthening collaboration among policymakers, regulatory agencies, and clinicians is crucial to overcoming current implementation barriers and ensuring equitable patient access to these advanced technologies.

Conclusion: This Consensus Statement presents 20 key statements across fundamental research, preclinical studies, and clinical trials & implementation, offering a roadmap for accelerating the regulatory and clinical translation of 3D-printed patient-specific bone implants. The findings emphasize the critical role of interdisciplinary collaboration in overcoming challenges, such as standardizing implant development and navigating complex regulatory landscapes. By addressing these barriers and outlining practical strategies, the consensus highlights actionable steps to bridge the gap between innovation and clinical application.
Original languageEnglish
JournalInternational Journal of Surgery
Volume111
Issue number11
Pages (from-to)7497-7506
ISSN1743-9191
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being
    SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being

Keywords

  • 3D-printed implants
  • Bone defects
  • Bone regeneration
  • Consensus
  • Interdisciplinary collaboration

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinical translation of 3D-printed patient-specific bone implants: a consensus statement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this