Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Climate change mitigation policy paradigms — national objectives and alignments

  • Kirsten Halsnæs
  • , Amit Garg
  • , John M. Christensen
  • , Tullik Helene Ystanes Føyn
  • , Maryna Karavai
  • , Emilio La Rovere
  • , Matthew Bramley
  • , Xianli Zhu
  • , Catherine Mitchell
  • , Joyashree Roy
  • , Kanako Tanaka
  • , Hidefumi Katayama
  • , Carlos Mena
  • , Imoh Obioh
  • , Igor Bashmakov
  • , Stanford Mwakasonda
  • , Myong-Kyoon Lee
  • , Marlene Vinluan
  • , Yu Joe Huang
  • , Laura Segafredo
    • Indian Institute of Management Ahmedabad
    • Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro
    • Pembina Institute
    • University of Exeter
    • Jadavpur University
    • Japan Science and Technology Agency
    • Mario Molina Center for Strategic Studies on Energy and the Environment
    • Obafemi Awolowo University
    • Center for Energy Efficiency
    • Engen Petroleum
    • Global Green Growth Institute
    • White Box Technologies
    • ClimateWorks Foundation

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

    Abstract

    The aim of this paper is to assess how policy goals in relation to the promotion of green growth, energy security, pollution control and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions have been aligned in policies that have been implemented in selected countries during the last decades as a basis for discussing how a multi objective policy paradigm can contribute to future climate change mitigation. The paper includes country case studies from Brazil, Canada, China, the European Union (EU), India, Japan, Mexico, Nigeria, South Africa, South Korea and the United States covering renewable energy options, industry, transportation, the residential sector and cross-sectoral policies. These countries and regions together contribute more than two thirds of global GHG emissions. The paper finds that policies that are nationally driven and that have multiple objectives, including climate-change mitigation, have been widely applied for decades in both developing countries and industrialised countries. Many of these policies have a long history, and adjustments have taken place based on experience and cost effectiveness concerns. Various energy and climate-change policy goals have worked together in these countries, and in practice a mix of policies reflecting specific priorities and contexts have been pursued. In this way, climate-change mitigation has been aligned with other policy objectives and integrated into broader policy packages, though in many cases specific attention has not been given to the achievement of large GHG emission reductions. Based on these experiences with policy implementation, the paper highlights a number of key coordination and design issues that are pertinent to the successful joint implementation of several energy and climate-change policy goals.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalMitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change
    Volume19
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)45-71
    ISSN1381-2386
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2014

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
    2. SDG 13 - Climate Action
      SDG 13 Climate Action

    Keywords

    • Climate change policies
    • Developing and industrialised countries
    • Coordination of multiple energy and climate change policy goals

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Climate change mitigation policy paradigms — national objectives and alignments'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this