Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

Chemical emissions from offshore wind farms: From identification to challenges in impact assessment and regulation

  • Elena Hengstmann
  • , Pablo Zapata Corella
  • , Katharina Alter
  • , Maria J. Belzunce-Segarra
  • , Andy M. Booth
  • , Javier Castro-Jiménez
  • , Niklas Czerner
  • , Karien De Cauwer
  • , Geneviève Deviller
  • , Alessio Gomiero
  • , Nils Goseberg
  • , Simone Hasenbein
  • , Torben Kirchgeorg
  • , Claire Mason
  • , Wiebke Pape
  • , Koen Parmentier
  • , Anna Plaß
  • , Daniel Pröfrock
  • , Ali Sarhadi
  • , David Vanavermaete
  • Johan van der Molen, Pedro Almeida Vinagre, Daniel Wood, Ingo Weinberg, Christian Windt, Alexa Zonderman, Jennifer Kenyon, Bavo De Witte*
*Corresponding author for this work
  • Federal Maritime and Hydrographic Agency of Germany
  • Institut français de recherche pour l'exploitation de la mer
  • Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research - NIOZ
  • AZTI
  • SINTEF
  • Technical University of Braunschweig
  • Royal Belgian Institute of Natural Sciences
  • DERAC-Deviller Environmental Risk Assessment of Chemicals Consultancy
  • NORCE Norwegian Research Centre AS
  • Centre for the Environment Fisheries and Aquaculture Science
  • Helmholtz-Zentrum Hereon
  • Research Institute for Agriculture and Fisheries
  • WavEC Offshore Renewables
  • U.S. Department of the Interior

Research output: Contribution to journal › Review › peer-review

90 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

Offshore wind energy may offer many advantages: next to the aim of renewable energy production, offshore wind farms (OWFs) enable multi-purpose opportunities with nature conservation and aquaculture. OWFs may also affect the marine ecosystem. The environmental impact of OWFs is starting to be investigated regarding the effect of novel habitat introduction, underwater noise, electromagnetic fields, or exclusion of fisheries. However, the impact of chemical emissions from OWFs remains largely unknown. It is essential to account for these emissions at an early stage, to comprehensively assess the environmental impact with the objective of developing a future fit-for-purpose regulatory framework to protect the marine environment. This review compiled a literature-based list of potential OWF-related chemical emissions containing >200 organic and inorganic contaminants, including polymers. Compounds are categorised according to data source and emission type. Major gaps in assessing the impact of the compounds are identified, including challenges in environmental monitoring, numerical modelling and assessing the toxicity of individual and mixtures of chemical contaminants on marine organisms and humans consuming potential OWF aquaculture products. A risk-based prioritisation is essential to target the compounds of higher concern and overcome costs linked to assessing a wide variety of chemical contaminants. Although some countries have regulations to reduce OWF chemical emissions, standardized impact assessments or monitoring requirements for OWF-based chemical contaminants have not been established. This stresses the importance of providing more detailed information on occurrence, distribution and impact of OWF chemical emissions as an essential step towards sound ecosystem-based management of OWF installations.
Original languageEnglish
Article number117915
JournalMarine Pollution Bulletin
Volume215
Number of pages19
ISSN0025-326X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
    SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
  2. SDG 14 - Life Below Water
    SDG 14 Life Below Water

Keywords

  • Offshore wind farms
  • Environmental monitoring
  • Numerical modelling
  • Impact assessment
  • Offshore wind farm regulations
  • Coatings
  • Anodes

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Chemical emissions from offshore wind farms: From identification to challenges in impact assessment and regulation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this