Abstract
Background: Bovine viral diarrhoea (BVD) is considered eradicated from Denmark. Currently, very few (if any) Danish
cattle herds could be infected with BVD virus (BVDV). The Danish antibody blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent
assay (ELISA) has been successfully used during the Danish BVD eradication program, initiated in 1994. During the last
decade, the cattle herd size has increased while the prevalence of BVDV has decreased. In this study, we investigated
how these changes could affect the performance of the Danish blocking ELISA and of the SVANOVIR®
BVDV-Ab indirect
ELISA. The latter has successfully been used to eradicate BVD in Sweden.
Data (2003–2010) on changes in median herd size and milk production levels, occurrence of viremic animals and bulk
milk surveillance were analysed. Additionally, the Danish blocking ELISA and the SVANOVIR ELISA were compared
analyzing milk and serum samples. The prevalence of antibody positive milking cows that could be detected by each
test was estimated, by diluting positive individual milk samples and making artificial milk pools.
Results: During the study period, the median herd size increased from 74 (2003) to 127 cows (2010), while the
prevalence of BVDV infected herds decreased from 0.51 to 0.02 %. The daily milk yield contribution of a single
seropositive cow to the entire daily bulk milk was reduced from 1.61 % in 2003 to 0.95 % in 2010 due to the
increased herd size. It was observed that antibody levels in bulk milk decreased at national level. Moreover, we
found that when testing bulk milk, the SVANOVIR®
BVDV-Ab can detect a lower prevalence of seropositive lactating
cows, compared to the Danish blocking ELISA (0.78 % vs. 50 %). Values in the SVANOVIR®
BVDV-Ab better relate to
low concentrations of antibody positive milk (R2 = 94-98 %), than values in the blocking ELISA (R2 = 23–75 %). For
sera, the two ELISAs performed equally well.
Conclusions: The SVANOVIR ELISA is recommended for analysis of bulk milk samples in the current Danish situation,
since infected dairy herds e.g. due to import of infected cattle can be detected shortly after BVDV introduction, when
only few lactating cows have seroconverted. In sera, the two ELISAs can be used interchangeably.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica (Online) |
Volume | 57 |
Issue number | 32 |
Number of pages | 8 |
ISSN | 0044-605X |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2015 |
Bibliographical note
© 2015 Foddai et al. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.Keywords
- Bovine viral diarrhoea
- Bulk milk
- Antibody ELISA
- Surveillance