Chalk porosity and sonic velocity versus burial depth: Influence of fluid pressure, hydrocarbons, and mineralogy

Ida Lykke Fabricius, Lars Gommesen, Anette Susanne Krogsbøll, Dan Olsen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    1 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Seventy chalk samples from four formations in the overpressured Danish central North Sea have been analyzed to investigate how correlations of porosity and sonic velocity with burial depth are affected by varying mineralogy, fluid pressure, and early introduction of petroleum. The results show that porosity and sonic velocity follow the most consistent depth trends when fluid pressure and pore-volume compressibility are considered. Quartz content up to 10% has no marked effect, but more than 5% clay causes lower porosity and velocity. The mineralogical effect differs between P-wave and shear velocity so that smectite-bearing chalk has a high Poisson's ratio in the water-saturated case, but a low value in the dry case. Oil-bearing chalk has up to 25 units higher porosity than water-saturated chalk at similar depth but similar velocity, probably because hydrocarbons prevent pore-filling cementation but not pore-structure stiffening cementation in this presumably water-wet chalk. These results should improve the modeling of chalk background velocity for seismic inversion analysis. When describing the porosity-reducing process, pore-volume compressibility should probably be disregarded when correcting for fluid pressure because the cementing ions originate from stylolites, which are mechanically similar to fractures. We find that cementation occurs over a relatively short depth interval.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalAAPG Bulletin
    Volume92
    Issue number2
    Pages (from-to)201-223
    ISSN0149-1423
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2008

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Chalk porosity and sonic velocity versus burial depth: Influence of fluid pressure, hydrocarbons, and mineralogy'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this