Capacitive Substrate Coupling of Row–Column-Addressed 2-D CMUT Arrays

    Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

    638 Downloads (Orbit)

    Abstract

    Row–column-addressed CMUT arrays suffer from low receive sensitivity of the bottom elements due to a capacitive coupling to the substrate. The capacitive coupling increases the parasitic capacitance. A simple approach to reduce the parasitic capacitance is presented, which is based on depleting the semiconductor substrate. To reduce the parasitic capacitance by 80% the bulk doping concentration should be at most 1012 cm-3. Experimental results show that the parasitic capacitance can be reduced by 87% by applying a substrate potential of 6V relative to the bottom electrodes. The depletion of the semiconductor substrate can be sustained for at least 10 minutes making it applicable for row–column-addressed CMUT arrays for ultrasonic imaging. Theoretically the reduced parasitic capacitance indicates that the receive sensitivity of the bottom elements can be increased by a factor of 2:1.
    Original languageEnglish
    Title of host publicationProceedings of 2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium
    Number of pages4
    PublisherIEEE
    Publication date2016
    ISBN (Print)978-1-4673-9898-5
    ISBN (Electronic)978-1-4673-9897-8
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2016
    Event2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium - Convention Center Vinci Tours, Tours, France
    Duration: 18 Sept 201621 Sept 2016
    https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/7589760/proceeding

    Conference

    Conference2016 IEEE International Ultrasonics Symposium
    LocationConvention Center Vinci Tours
    Country/TerritoryFrance
    CityTours
    Period18/09/201621/09/2016
    Internet address

    Keywords

    • Substrates
    • Electrodes
    • Parasitic capacitance
    • Couplings
    • Doping
    • Capacitance measurement

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Capacitive Substrate Coupling of Row–Column-Addressed 2-D CMUT Arrays'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this