Benefits of Cooperation in Transnational Water-Energy Systems

Jakob Luchner*, Niels D. Riegels, Peter Bauer-Gottwein

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

106 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Cooperation in international river basins is often challenged by upstream–downstream conflicts over water allocation. In many cases, water allocation is linked to the energy sector through hydropower. In this study, the water value method was used to simulate reservoir operations in an international basin under different assumptions about national priorities and regional energy cooperation. Benefits in the water sector and the power sector were compared considering both cooperative and noncooperative behavior by national players. The approach is demonstrated for a semiarid international river basin characterized by conflict between upstream hydropower production and downstream irrigated agriculture. A scenario assuming regional cooperation in the power sector came closest to the multisectoral basin cooperation benchmark and produced fewer national costs than scenarios assuming noncooperative behavior. The results emphasize that power and water resource allocation should be viewed jointly in international river basins where upstream hydropower operations can impact downstream irrigation supplies. International cooperation in the power sector may ease upstream–downstream conflicts in these cases.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Water Resources Planning and Management
Volume145
Issue number5
ISSN0733-9496
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Cite this

@article{778ffaae4fa945969fe5196c57c7e136,
title = "Benefits of Cooperation in Transnational Water-Energy Systems",
abstract = "Cooperation in international river basins is often challenged by upstream–downstream conflicts over water allocation. In many cases, water allocation is linked to the energy sector through hydropower. In this study, the water value method was used to simulate reservoir operations in an international basin under different assumptions about national priorities and regional energy cooperation. Benefits in the water sector and the power sector were compared considering both cooperative and noncooperative behavior by national players. The approach is demonstrated for a semiarid international river basin characterized by conflict between upstream hydropower production and downstream irrigated agriculture. A scenario assuming regional cooperation in the power sector came closest to the multisectoral basin cooperation benchmark and produced fewer national costs than scenarios assuming noncooperative behavior. The results emphasize that power and water resource allocation should be viewed jointly in international river basins where upstream hydropower operations can impact downstream irrigation supplies. International cooperation in the power sector may ease upstream–downstream conflicts in these cases.",
author = "Jakob Luchner and Riegels, {Niels D.} and Peter Bauer-Gottwein",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001047",
language = "English",
volume = "145",
journal = "Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management",
issn = "0733-9496",
publisher = "American Society of Civil Engineers",
number = "5",

}

Benefits of Cooperation in Transnational Water-Energy Systems. / Luchner, Jakob; Riegels, Niels D.; Bauer-Gottwein, Peter.

In: Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, Vol. 145, No. 5, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - Benefits of Cooperation in Transnational Water-Energy Systems

AU - Luchner, Jakob

AU - Riegels, Niels D.

AU - Bauer-Gottwein, Peter

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Cooperation in international river basins is often challenged by upstream–downstream conflicts over water allocation. In many cases, water allocation is linked to the energy sector through hydropower. In this study, the water value method was used to simulate reservoir operations in an international basin under different assumptions about national priorities and regional energy cooperation. Benefits in the water sector and the power sector were compared considering both cooperative and noncooperative behavior by national players. The approach is demonstrated for a semiarid international river basin characterized by conflict between upstream hydropower production and downstream irrigated agriculture. A scenario assuming regional cooperation in the power sector came closest to the multisectoral basin cooperation benchmark and produced fewer national costs than scenarios assuming noncooperative behavior. The results emphasize that power and water resource allocation should be viewed jointly in international river basins where upstream hydropower operations can impact downstream irrigation supplies. International cooperation in the power sector may ease upstream–downstream conflicts in these cases.

AB - Cooperation in international river basins is often challenged by upstream–downstream conflicts over water allocation. In many cases, water allocation is linked to the energy sector through hydropower. In this study, the water value method was used to simulate reservoir operations in an international basin under different assumptions about national priorities and regional energy cooperation. Benefits in the water sector and the power sector were compared considering both cooperative and noncooperative behavior by national players. The approach is demonstrated for a semiarid international river basin characterized by conflict between upstream hydropower production and downstream irrigated agriculture. A scenario assuming regional cooperation in the power sector came closest to the multisectoral basin cooperation benchmark and produced fewer national costs than scenarios assuming noncooperative behavior. The results emphasize that power and water resource allocation should be viewed jointly in international river basins where upstream hydropower operations can impact downstream irrigation supplies. International cooperation in the power sector may ease upstream–downstream conflicts in these cases.

U2 - 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001047

DO - 10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0001047

M3 - Journal article

VL - 145

JO - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

JF - Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management

SN - 0733-9496

IS - 5

ER -