Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities

Niels Gregersen; Jakob Rosenkrantz de Lasson; Lars Hagedorn Frandsen; Teppo Häyrynen; Andrei Lavrinenko; Jesper Mørk; Fengwen Wang; Ole Sigmund; Oleksiy S. Kim; Olav Breinbjerg; Aliaksandra Ivinskaya; Philipp Gutsche; Sven Burger

doi:10.1109/NUSOD.2017.8010005

Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities

Niels Gregersen, Jakob Rosenkrantz de Lasson, Lars Hagedorn Frandsen, Teppo Häyrynen, Andrei Lavrinenko, Jesper Mørk, Fengwen Wang, Ole Sigmund, Oleksiy S. Kim, Olav Breinbjerg, Aliaksandra Ivinskaya, Philipp Gutsche, Sven Burger

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

We benchmark five state-of-the-art computational methods by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analyzing line defect cavities.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD)
Publisher	IEEE
Publication date	2017
Pages	89-90
ISBN (Electronic)	978-1-5090-5323-0
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/NUSOD.2017.8010005
Publication status	Published - 2017
Event	17th International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD17) - Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark Duration: 24 Jul 2017 → 28 Jul 2017

Conference

Conference	17th International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD17)
Country/Territory	Denmark
City	Kgs. Lyngby
Period	24/07/2017 → 28/07/2017

Keywords

Photonic crystal
Microcavity
Line defect cavity
Quality factor
Numerical simulations

Access to Document

10.1109/NUSOD.2017.8010005

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

Gregersen, N., de Lasson, J. R., Frandsen, L. H., Häyrynen, T., Lavrinenko, A., Mørk, J., Wang, F., Sigmund, O., Kim, O. S., Breinbjerg, O., Ivinskaya, A., Gutsche, P., & Burger, S. (2017). Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities. In Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD) (pp. 89-90). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/NUSOD.2017.8010005

@inproceedings{69b05f5242e64b2f86d5bfe488b63e2d,

title = "Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities",

abstract = "We benchmark five state-of-the-art computational methods by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analyzing line defect cavities.",

keywords = "Photonic crystal, Microcavity, Line defect cavity, Quality factor, Numerical simulations",

author = "Niels Gregersen and {de Lasson}, {Jakob Rosenkrantz} and Frandsen, {Lars Hagedorn} and Teppo H{\"a}yrynen and Andrei Lavrinenko and Jesper M{\o}rk and Fengwen Wang and Ole Sigmund and Kim, {Oleksiy S.} and Olav Breinbjerg and Aliaksandra Ivinskaya and Philipp Gutsche and Sven Burger",

year = "2017",

doi = "10.1109/NUSOD.2017.8010005",

language = "English",

pages = "89--90",

booktitle = "Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD)",

publisher = "IEEE",

address = "United States",

note = "17th International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD17) ; Conference date: 24-07-2017 Through 28-07-2017",

}

Gregersen, N, de Lasson, JR, Frandsen, LH, Häyrynen, T, Lavrinenko, A , Mørk, J, Wang, F, Sigmund, O, Kim, OS, Breinbjerg, O, Ivinskaya, A, Gutsche, P & Burger, S 2017, Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities. in Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD). IEEE, pp. 89-90, 17th International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD17) , Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, 24/07/2017. https://doi.org/10.1109/NUSOD.2017.8010005

Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities. / Gregersen, Niels; de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz; Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn et al.
Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD). IEEE, 2017. p. 89-90.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities

AU - Gregersen, Niels

AU - de Lasson, Jakob Rosenkrantz

AU - Frandsen, Lars Hagedorn

AU - Häyrynen, Teppo

AU - Lavrinenko, Andrei

AU - Mørk, Jesper

AU - Wang, Fengwen

AU - Sigmund, Ole

AU - Kim, Oleksiy S.

AU - Breinbjerg, Olav

AU - Ivinskaya, Aliaksandra

AU - Gutsche, Philipp

AU - Burger, Sven

PY - 2017

Y1 - 2017

N2 - We benchmark five state-of-the-art computational methods by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analyzing line defect cavities.

AB - We benchmark five state-of-the-art computational methods by computing quality factors and resonance wavelengths in photonic crystal membrane L5 and L9 line defect cavities. The convergence of the methods with respect to resolution, degrees of freedom and number of modes is investigated. Convergence is not obtained for some of the methods, indicating that some are more suitable than others for analyzing line defect cavities.

KW - Photonic crystal

KW - Microcavity

KW - Line defect cavity

KW - Quality factor

KW - Numerical simulations

U2 - 10.1109/NUSOD.2017.8010005

DO - 10.1109/NUSOD.2017.8010005

M3 - Article in proceedings

SP - 89

EP - 90

BT - Proceedings of the 2017 International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD)

PB - IEEE

T2 - 17th International Conference on Numerical Simulation of Optoelectronic Devices (NUSOD17)

Y2 - 24 July 2017 through 28 July 2017

ER -

Benchmarking five computational methods for analyzing large photonic crystal membrane cavities

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this