Balancing simplicity and complexity through corporate emissions benchmarking

  • Saphira Rekker*
  • , Kaya Axelsson
  • , Anders Bjørn
  • , Chris Greig
  • , Richard Heede
  • , Matthew J. Hornsey
  • , Jacquelyn E. Humphrey
  • , Matthew Ives
  • , David Kampmann
  • , Mark Roelfsema
  • , Adrien Rose
  • , Sue Lyn Stubbs
  • , Belinda Wade
  • *Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalComment/debateResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Standardized quantitative emissions benchmarking is essential for corporate climate accountability, yet recent literature has critiqued this approach. We argue for structured pluralism with budget compliance — balancing methodological flexibility while preserving the disciplining power of carbon budgets.
Original languageEnglish
JournalNature Climate Change
Volume15
Pages (from-to)1127-1129
Number of pages3
ISSN1758-678X
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

  1. SDG 13 - Climate Action
    SDG 13 Climate Action

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Balancing simplicity and complexity through corporate emissions benchmarking'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this