Abstract
Many educationists recommend that learning objectives should be given in a behaviouristic way with directly observable actions. At the same time cognitive constructivism seems to be the preferred theory within the engineering educational community. There is no conflict in using a behavioural approach to assess final competences in a constructivist setting, but during an education we should evaluate the progress of the student’s learning. One way could be to look at the student’s errors.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Title of host publication | SEFI 2005 Proceedings |
| Publication date | 2005 |
| Pages | 161-167 |
| ISBN (Print) | 975-429-236-1 |
| Publication status | Published - 2005 |
| Event | 33rd SEFI Annual Conference - Ankara, Turkey Duration: 7 Sept 2005 → 10 Sept 2005 |
Conference
| Conference | 33rd SEFI Annual Conference |
|---|---|
| Country/Territory | Turkey |
| City | Ankara |
| Period | 07/09/2005 → 10/09/2005 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'At the crossroad between behaviourism and cognitive constructivism'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver