Assessing and managing multiple risks in a changing world — The Roskilde recommendations

  • Henriette Selck
  • , Peter B. Adamsen
  • , Thomas Backhaus
  • , Gary T. Banta
  • , Peter K.H. Bruce
  • , G. Allen Burton Jr.
  • , Michael B. Butts
  • , Eva Boegh
  • , John J. Clague
  • , Khuong Van Dinh
  • , Neelke Doorn
  • , Jonas S. Gunnarsson
  • , Henrik Hauggaard-Nielsen
  • , Charles Hazlerigg
  • , Agnieszka D. Hunka
  • , John Jensen
  • , Yan Lin
  • , Susana Loureiro
  • , Simona Miraglia
  • , Wayne R. Munns Jr.
  • Farrokh Nadim, Annemette Palmqvist, Robert A. Rämö, Lauren P. Seaby, Kristian Syberg, Stine Rosendal Tangaa, Amalie Thit, Ronja Windfeld, Maciej Zalewski, Peter M. Chapmann

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

342 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

Roskilde University (Denmark) hosted a November 2015 workshop, Environmental Risk—Assessing and Managing Multiple Risks in a Changing World. This Focus article presents the consensus recommendations of 30 attendees from 9 countries regarding implementation of a common currency (ecosystem services) for holistic environmental risk assessment and management; improvements to risk assessment and management in a complex, human‐modified, and changing world; appropriate development of protection goals in a 2‐stage process; dealing with societal issues; risk‐management information needs; conducting risk assessment of risk management; and development of adaptive and flexible regulatory systems. The authors encourage both cross‐disciplinary and interdisciplinary approaches to address their 10 recommendations: 1) adopt ecosystem services as a common currency for risk assessment and management; 2) consider cumulative stressors (chemical and nonchemical) and determine which dominate to best manage and restore ecosystem services; 3) fully integrate risk managers and communities of interest into the risk‐assessment process; 4) fully integrate risk assessors and communities of interest into the risk‐management process; 5) consider socioeconomics and increased transparency in both risk assessment and risk management; 6) recognize the ethical rights of humans and ecosystems to an adequate level of protection; 7) determine relevant reference conditions and the proper ecological context for assessments in human‐modified systems; 8) assess risks and benefits to humans and the ecosystem and consider unintended consequences of management actions; 9) avoid excessive conservatism or possible underprotection resulting from sole reliance on binary, numerical benchmarks; and 10) develop adaptive risk‐management and regulatory goals based on ranges of uncertainty.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEnvironmental Toxicology and Chemistry
Volume36
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)7-16
Number of pages10
ISSN0730-7268
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2017

Keywords

  • Risk assessment
  • Risk management
  • Ecosystem services
  • Climate change
  • Wicked problems
  • Multiple environmental stressors

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing and managing multiple risks in a changing world — The Roskilde recommendations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
  • COFUNDPostdocDTU: COFUNDPostdocDTU

    Præstrud, M. R. (Project Participant) & Brodersen, S. W. (Project Participant)

    01/01/201431/12/2019

    Project: Research

Cite this