Are Some Family Members Harmful? – A Study on Diploid Cellular Automata

Souvik Roy, Harsh Modi, Rahil Patel, Sumit Adak*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

This paper explores diploid elementary cellular automata (ECA) systems where the rules of the cellular systems are acquired with a random mixing of two ECAs. However, here, we consider two ECAs from the same family following left to right, 0 to 1, and both transformations. Following the experimental approach, this study classifies the dynamics of (all possible) 300 diploid family couples following Wolfram’s and Li and Packard’s classification. We investigate the resistance of this diploid system against this family perturbation. As we will see, this study is interesting enough to provide the following rich phenomenon: (1) two-periodic family couple together show chaotic dynamics and vice-versa; (2) some diploid couple changes their class dynamics after a critical value of mixing rate, i.e. class transition; and (3) lastly, these diploid couples are also capable to show continuous or second-order phase transition dynamics.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry
Volume14978
Publication date2024
Pages10-21
ISBN (Print)978-3-031-71551-8
ISBN (Electronic)978-3-031-71552-5
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024
Event16th International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry - Florence, Italy
Duration: 9 Sept 202411 Sept 2024

Conference

Conference16th International Conference on Cellular Automata for Research and Industry
Country/TerritoryItaly
CityFlorence
Period09/09/202411/09/2024

Keywords

  • Chaos
  • Class Transition
  • Classification
  • Diploid Cellular Automata
  • Phase Transition

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Are Some Family Members Harmful? – A Study on Diploid Cellular Automata'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this