AOP key event relationship report: Linking androgen receptor antagonism with nipple retention

Emilie Bak Pedersen, Sofie Christiansen, Terje Svingen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

107 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In rat developmental and reproductive toxicity studies, nipple/areola retention (NR) in male offspring is a biomarker for reduced androgen signaling during development. This is because nipples normally regress in male rats in response to androgen signaling during critical stages of development. NR is thus included as a mandatory endpoint in several OECD test guidelines for assessment of chemicals, particularly as a readout for anti-androgenic effects relevant for reproductive toxicity. With the growing interest in developing Adverse Outcome Pathways (AOPs) to aid in chemical risk assessment, a more pragmatic approach has been proposed, whereby essential units of knowledge could be developed independently of complete AOPs, not least emergent key event relationships (KERs). Herein, we have developed a KER linking "androgen receptor antagonism" and "increased areola/nipple retention". The KER is based on a literature review conducted in a transparent semi-systematic manner in peer-reviewed databases with pre-defined inclusion criteria. Twenty-seven papers were included for development of the KER. The results support a qualitative relationship between the two key events (KEs) with a high weight of evidence; i.e., a causal relationship between androgen receptor (AR) antagonism and nipple retention in male rats exists.
Original languageEnglish
Article number100085
JournalCurrent Research in Toxicology
Volume3
Number of pages9
ISSN2666-027x
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2022

Keywords

  • AOP
  • KER
  • Androgen receptor
  • Nipples
  • Reproductive toxicology
  • Endocrine disrupting chemicals

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'AOP key event relationship report: Linking androgen receptor antagonism with nipple retention'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this