Antimicrobial evaluation of Huilliche plant medicine used to treat wounds

Per Mølgaard, Jes Gitz Holler, Betül Asar, Iwona Liberna, Lise Bakkestrøm Rosenbæk, Christina Ploug Jebjerg, Lene Jørgensen, Jeanette Lauritzen, Alfonso Guzman, Anne Adsersen, Henrik Toft Simonsen

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Ethnopharmacological relevanceThe traditional use of 40 plant species used for treatment of wounds and associated infections by the Huilliche people of Chile was evaluated against bacterial and fungal human pathogens, especially including wound pathogens. Materials and methodsThe extracts were tested against the fungi Penicillium expansum, Candida albicans and the bacteria Bacillus subtilis, Pseudomonas aeruginosa (four different strains), Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli (four different strains), Streptococcus pneumoniae (four different strains with one being resistance to streptomycin). ResultsThirteen of the plant species have interesting antimicrobial activities, with that of Acaena argentea, Aristotelia chilensis, Blechnum chilense, Francoa appendiculta, Gevuina avellana and Laureliopsis philippiana being the most noteworthy. ConclusionsThe findings in the manuscript support the traditional use by the Huilliche people, and allow enhanced economical benefit and use by the locals. The results obtained on Acaena argentea, Aristotelia chilensis, Blechnum chilense, Francoa appendiculta, Gevuina avellana and Laureliopsis philippiana are of specific scientific interest, and further studies is needed in order to establish the active constituents of the species.
Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of Ethnopharmacology
Volume138
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)219-227
ISSN0378-8741
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2011
Externally publishedYes

Keywords

  • Wound infection
  • Chile
  • Antimicrobial
  • Huilliche

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Antimicrobial evaluation of Huilliche plant medicine used to treat wounds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this