Analysis of trends and allergenicity risk assessments in novel food approvals within the European Union between 2018 and 2023

Sim Ray Yue*, Kitty C.M. Verhoeckx, Geert F. Houben, Katrine Lindholm Bøgh

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Novel food (NF) approvals in the European Union between 2018 and 2023 (n = 117) were retrieved and analysed. They consist of new NF (52.1%), modification (38.5%), and traditional food (9.4%). The average time taken for new NF applications to be approved was 38 months in 2023, with clock-stops occurring in all approvals since 2020. For new NFs, only 21.3% and 9.8% performed tests by bioinformatics homology and immunological analyses respectively, suggesting that allergenicity assessments remain a challenge. Allergenicity risks were regarded as possible for 47.5% of the new NF approvals, while 52.5% were expected to be low, very low, or unlikely. However, it was not always clear what the decision was based on. While protein intake levels were rarely mentioned in the allergenicity conclusions of approvals, new NFs with allergenicity risks typically had protein intake exceeding 1 mg/day. Establishing a dose that represents a Threshold of Allergological Concern below which a protein is unlikely to cause sensitisation in consumers, could make de novo allergenicity assessment of NFs more feasible. This approach might exempt certain proteins from testing, instead focusing on proteins of possible allergenic relevance.
Original languageEnglish
Article number115249
JournalFood and Chemical Toxicology
Volume197
Number of pages11
ISSN0278-6915
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2025

Keywords

  • Allergenicity assessment
  • Food allergies
  • Novel foods
  • Risk assessment
  • Threshold of allergological concern

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of trends and allergenicity risk assessments in novel food approvals within the European Union between 2018 and 2023'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this