Analysis of intra-genomic GC content homogeneity within prokaryotes

J Bohlin, L Snipen, S.P. Hardy, A.B. Kristoffersen, Karin Lagesen, T. Donsvik, E. Skjerve, David Ussery

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    305 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Bacterial genomes possess varying GC content (total guanines (Gs) and cytosines (Cs) per total of the four bases within the genome) but within a given genome, GC content can vary locally along the chromosome, with some regions significantly more or less GC rich than on average. We have examined how the GC content varies within microbial genomes to assess whether this property can be associated with certain biological functions related to the organism's environment and phylogeny. We utilize a new quantity GCVAR, the intra-genomic GC content variability with respect to the average GC content of the total genome. A low GCVAR indicates intra-genomic GC homogeneity and high GCVAR heterogeneity. RESULTS: The regression analyses indicated that GCVAR was significantly associated with domain (i.e. archaea or bacteria), phylum, and oxygen requirement. GCVAR was significantly higher among anaerobes than both aerobic and facultative microbes. Although an association has previously been found between mean genomic GC content and oxygen requirement, our analysis suggests that no such association exits when phylogenetic bias is accounted for. A significant association between GCVAR and mean GC content was also found but appears to be non-linear and varies greatly among phyla. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings show that GCVAR is linked with oxygen requirement, while mean genomic GC content is not. We therefore suggest that GCVAR should be used as a complement to mean GC content.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalB M C Genomics
    Volume11
    Pages (from-to)464
    ISSN1471-2164
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2010

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Analysis of intra-genomic GC content homogeneity within prokaryotes'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this