TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of Electron Transparent Beam-Sensitive Samples Using Scanning Electron Microscopy Coupled with Energy-Dispersive X-ray Spectroscopy
AU - Brostrøm, Anders
AU - Kling, Kirsten Inga
AU - Hougaard, Karin Sørig
AU - Mølhave, Kristian
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - Scanning electron microscopy, coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), is a powerful tool used in many scientific fields. It can provide nanoscale images, allowing size and morphology measurements, as well as provide information on the spatial distribution of elements in a sample. This study compares the capabilities of a traditional EDS detector with a recently developed annular EDS detector when analyzing electron transparent and beam-sensitive NaCl particles on a TEM grid. The optimal settings for single particle analysis are identified in order to minimize beam damage and optimize sample throughput via the choice of acceleration voltage, EDS acquisition time, and quantification model. Here, a linear combination of two models is used to bridge results for particle sizes, which are neither bulk nor sufficiently thin to assume electron transparent. Additionally, we show that the increased count rate obtainable with the annular detector enables mapping as a viable analysis strategy compared with feature detection methods, which only scan segmented regions. Finally, we discuss advantages and disadvantages of the two analysis strategies.
AB - Scanning electron microscopy, coupled with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), is a powerful tool used in many scientific fields. It can provide nanoscale images, allowing size and morphology measurements, as well as provide information on the spatial distribution of elements in a sample. This study compares the capabilities of a traditional EDS detector with a recently developed annular EDS detector when analyzing electron transparent and beam-sensitive NaCl particles on a TEM grid. The optimal settings for single particle analysis are identified in order to minimize beam damage and optimize sample throughput via the choice of acceleration voltage, EDS acquisition time, and quantification model. Here, a linear combination of two models is used to bridge results for particle sizes, which are neither bulk nor sufficiently thin to assume electron transparent. Additionally, we show that the increased count rate obtainable with the annular detector enables mapping as a viable analysis strategy compared with feature detection methods, which only scan segmented regions. Finally, we discuss advantages and disadvantages of the two analysis strategies.
KW - Aerosol
KW - Electron microscopy
KW - Energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy
KW - Particle
U2 - 10.1017/S1431927620001464
DO - 10.1017/S1431927620001464
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 32475372
SN - 1431-9276
VL - 26
SP - 373
EP - 386
JO - Microscopy and Microanalysis
JF - Microscopy and Microanalysis
IS - 3
ER -