Skip to main navigation Skip to search Skip to main content

An integer superstructure model to find a sustainable biorefinery platform for valorizing household waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, and biochemicals

  • Seyedeh Nashmin Elyasi
  • , Shahin Rafiee
  • , Seyed Saeed Mohtasebi
  • , Panagiotis Tsapekos
  • , Irini Angelidaki
  • , Hongbin Liu
  • , Benyamin Khoshnevisan*
  • *Corresponding author for this work
    • University of Tehran
    • Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences

    Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

    Abstract

    In this study, a superstructure-based decision making model is presented to determine the most sustainable biorefining pathway of organic fraction of municipal solid waste, i.e., anaerobic digestion, fermentation for bio-succinic acid and lactic acid recovery, and single cell protein production, as well as the best downstream process for the produced biogas. Based on the possible bioprocess routes created from implied technologies, thirteen scenarios were developed to perform mass and energy balances as well as environmental life cycle assessments. Subsequently, a general superstructure-based multi-criteria decision making model was designed representing possible technologies at each stage of biomass processing and their interconnections. The optimal biorefining route for achieving a sustainability solution was selected based on energetic, economic, and environmental aspects; three objective functions for maximizing energy saving and profitability, and minimizing greenhouse gas emissions. The results achieved in this study demonstrated that the scenario including anaerobic digestion of organic fraction of municipal solid waste coupled with a biological biogas upgrading unit for bio-methanation of biogas into fuel-grade bioCH4 was the most sustainable biorefining route. This scenario led to a greenhouse gas saving of 243.4 kg CO2 eq/t biopulp and a primary energy saving of 4664.77 MJ/t biopulp, creating a profit of 145.41 €/t biopulp. On the contrary, biosuccinic acid production with cogeneration of heat & power and bioCH4 with further use as home cooking fuel found to be the least preference for biowaste valorization. The sensitivity analysis showed that fluctuations in production costs and revenue would not change the rank of scenarios however the profitability of scenarios would change to some extent. The framework presented herein is a promising approach to find the most sustainable biorefining rout out of several technically-possible solutions. Such framework would be even more applicable if other important aspects such as spatio-temporal parameters, policy regulations, market-driven factors, etc. to be included in the decision making process.

    Original languageEnglish
    Article number123986
    JournalJournal of cleaner production
    Volume278
    Number of pages14
    ISSN0959-6526
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2021

    UN SDGs

    This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

    1. SDG 7 - Affordable and Clean Energy
      SDG 7 Affordable and Clean Energy
    2. SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities
      SDG 11 Sustainable Cities and Communities
    3. SDG 12 - Responsible Consumption and Production
      SDG 12 Responsible Consumption and Production

    Keywords

    • Anaerobic digestion
    • Biochemicals
    • Biorefinery
    • Fermentation
    • Organic waste valorization

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'An integer superstructure model to find a sustainable biorefinery platform for valorizing household waste to bioenergy, microbial protein, and biochemicals'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this