An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers

Saeema Ahmed, B T Christensen

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    This paper describes a study to understand the use of analogies by design engineers with different levels of experience in an adaptive design domain. Protocol analyses of 12 design engineers have been analyzed to understand the functions and reasoning of the analogies. The protocols are real-world data from the aerospace industry. The findings indicate a significant difference in both the use of analogies by novices and experienced designers and the reasoning from the analogies. Novices were found to predominantly transfer information related to the geometric properties without explicit reference to relevant design issues or to the appropriateness of applying the analogy, whereas experienced designers tended to use analogies for problem solving and problem identification. Experienced designers were found to use the analogy to reason about the function of a component and the predicted behavior of the component, whereas the novices seem to lack such reasoning processes.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalJournal of Mechanical Design
    Volume131
    Issue number11
    Pages (from-to)111004
    ISSN1050-0472
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Cite this

    Ahmed, Saeema ; Christensen, B T. / An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers. In: Journal of Mechanical Design. 2009 ; Vol. 131, No. 11. pp. 111004.
    @article{f0b031c71c824f419a5555dce878e883,
    title = "An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers",
    abstract = "This paper describes a study to understand the use of analogies by design engineers with different levels of experience in an adaptive design domain. Protocol analyses of 12 design engineers have been analyzed to understand the functions and reasoning of the analogies. The protocols are real-world data from the aerospace industry. The findings indicate a significant difference in both the use of analogies by novices and experienced designers and the reasoning from the analogies. Novices were found to predominantly transfer information related to the geometric properties without explicit reference to relevant design issues or to the appropriateness of applying the analogy, whereas experienced designers tended to use analogies for problem solving and problem identification. Experienced designers were found to use the analogy to reason about the function of a component and the predicted behavior of the component, whereas the novices seem to lack such reasoning processes.",
    author = "Saeema Ahmed and Christensen, {B T}",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1115/1.3184693",
    language = "English",
    volume = "131",
    pages = "111004",
    journal = "Journal of Mechanical Design",
    issn = "1050-0472",
    publisher = "American Society of Mechanical Engineers",
    number = "11",

    }

    An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers. / Ahmed, Saeema; Christensen, B T.

    In: Journal of Mechanical Design, Vol. 131, No. 11, 2009, p. 111004.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - An In Situ Study of Analogical Reasoning in Novice and Experienced Design Engineers

    AU - Ahmed, Saeema

    AU - Christensen, B T

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - This paper describes a study to understand the use of analogies by design engineers with different levels of experience in an adaptive design domain. Protocol analyses of 12 design engineers have been analyzed to understand the functions and reasoning of the analogies. The protocols are real-world data from the aerospace industry. The findings indicate a significant difference in both the use of analogies by novices and experienced designers and the reasoning from the analogies. Novices were found to predominantly transfer information related to the geometric properties without explicit reference to relevant design issues or to the appropriateness of applying the analogy, whereas experienced designers tended to use analogies for problem solving and problem identification. Experienced designers were found to use the analogy to reason about the function of a component and the predicted behavior of the component, whereas the novices seem to lack such reasoning processes.

    AB - This paper describes a study to understand the use of analogies by design engineers with different levels of experience in an adaptive design domain. Protocol analyses of 12 design engineers have been analyzed to understand the functions and reasoning of the analogies. The protocols are real-world data from the aerospace industry. The findings indicate a significant difference in both the use of analogies by novices and experienced designers and the reasoning from the analogies. Novices were found to predominantly transfer information related to the geometric properties without explicit reference to relevant design issues or to the appropriateness of applying the analogy, whereas experienced designers tended to use analogies for problem solving and problem identification. Experienced designers were found to use the analogy to reason about the function of a component and the predicted behavior of the component, whereas the novices seem to lack such reasoning processes.

    U2 - 10.1115/1.3184693

    DO - 10.1115/1.3184693

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 131

    SP - 111004

    JO - Journal of Mechanical Design

    JF - Journal of Mechanical Design

    SN - 1050-0472

    IS - 11

    ER -