TY - JOUR
T1 - Airborne gravimetry with quantum technology
T2 - observations from Iceland and Greenland
AU - Jensen, Tim Enzlberger
AU - Dale, Bjørnar
AU - Stokholm, Andreas
AU - Forsberg, René
AU - Bresson, Alexandre
AU - Zahzam, Nassim
AU - Bonnin, Alexis
AU - Bidel, Yannick
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© Author(s) 2025.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - We report on the availability of data from an airborne gravity campaign in Iceland and Greenland conducted during June and July 2023. The dataset includes observations from a platform-stabilised gravimeter based on cold-atom quantum technology and a strapdown gravimeter based on classical technology. The data are available at three different levels of processing, making them relevant to users interested in working with "quantum"and "hybrid"data as well as users interested in geophysical studies. The paper describes the data processing applied to derive the various levels of data and presents an evaluation of the accuracy of the data. This evaluation indicates an accuracy of 1-2 mGal for both sensors, depending on the roughness of the gravity field. Although the two technologies lead to similar performance, further analysis indicates that the error characteristics are different and that the final estimates would benefit from a combination (data available at 10.57780/esa-58c58c5; see Jensen et al., 2024).
AB - We report on the availability of data from an airborne gravity campaign in Iceland and Greenland conducted during June and July 2023. The dataset includes observations from a platform-stabilised gravimeter based on cold-atom quantum technology and a strapdown gravimeter based on classical technology. The data are available at three different levels of processing, making them relevant to users interested in working with "quantum"and "hybrid"data as well as users interested in geophysical studies. The paper describes the data processing applied to derive the various levels of data and presents an evaluation of the accuracy of the data. This evaluation indicates an accuracy of 1-2 mGal for both sensors, depending on the roughness of the gravity field. Although the two technologies lead to similar performance, further analysis indicates that the error characteristics are different and that the final estimates would benefit from a combination (data available at 10.57780/esa-58c58c5; see Jensen et al., 2024).
U2 - 10.5194/essd-17-1667-2025
DO - 10.5194/essd-17-1667-2025
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:105002738081
SN - 1866-3508
VL - 17
SP - 1667
EP - 1684
JO - Earth System Science Data
JF - Earth System Science Data
IS - 4
ER -