Adaptation requirements due to anatomical changes in free-breathing and deep-inspiration breath-hold for standard and dose-escalated radiotherapy of lung cancer patients

Patrik Sibolt, Wiviann Ottosson, David Sjöström, Christina Larsen, Claus F. Behrens

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    425 Downloads (Pure)

    Abstract

    Background. Radiotherapy of lung cancer patients is subject to uncertainties related to heterogeneities, anatomical changes and breathing motion. Use of deep-inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) can reduce the treated volume, potentially enabling dose-escalated (DE) treatments. This study was designed to investigate the need for adaptation due to anatomical changes, for both standard (ST) and DE plans in free-breathing (FB) and DIBH.
    Material and methods. The effect of tumor shrinkage (TS), pleural effusion (PE) and atelectasis was investigated for patients and for a CIRS thorax phantom. Sixteen patients were computed tomography (CT) imaged both in FB and DIBH. Anatomical changes were simulated by CT information editing and re-calculations, of both ST and DE plans, in the treatment planning system. PE was systematically simulated by adding fl uid in the dorsal region of the lung and TS by reduction of the tumor volume.
    Results. Phantom simulations resulted in maximum deviations in mean dose to the GTV-T ( < D > GTV-T ) of -1% for 3 cm PE and centrally located tumor, and + 3% for TS from 5 cm to 1 cm diameter for an anterior tumor location. For the majority of the patients, simulated PE resulted in a decreasing < D > GTV-T with increasing amount of fluid and increasing < D > GTV-T for decreasing tumor volume. Maximum change in < D > GTV-T of -3% (3 cm PE in FB for both ST and DE plans) and + 10% (2 cm TS in FB for DE plan) was observed. Large atelectasis reduction increased the < D > GTV-T with 2% for FB and had no effect for DIBH.
    Conclusion. Phantom simulations provided potential adaptation action levels for PE and TS. For the more complex patient geometry, individual assessment of the dosimetric impact is recommended for both ST and DE plans in DIBH as well as in FB. However, DIBH was found to be superior over FB for DE plans, regarding robustness of < D > GTV-T to TS.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalActa Oncologica
    Volume54
    Issue number9
    Pages (from-to)1453-1460
    ISSN0284-186X
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2015

    Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'Adaptation requirements due to anatomical changes in free-breathing and deep-inspiration breath-hold for standard and dose-escalated radiotherapy of lung cancer patients'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this