Abstract
Temporary and permanent organisations have contrasting yet codependent perspectives regarding time; temporary organisations are made to ‘die’, yet most of them exist to enable permanent organisations to ‘survive’. The authors studied the temporal tensions of strategic initiatives – that is, temporary organisations that aim to implement strategic change in permanent organisations. Our empirical data identified three temporal tensions emerging when senior managers timed their strategic initiatives: ambition versus realism when enacting the time horizon, patience versus urgency when enacting the pace, and clock time versus event time when enacting the temporal perspective. By evoking the literature on paradox
and temporal work, the authors extend the view of temporality at the temporary and permanent interface and indicate how temporal work played an important role in creating, reinforcing, or transforming temporal tensions. The authors conclude by providing implications for theory and practice.
and temporal work, the authors extend the view of temporality at the temporary and permanent interface and indicate how temporal work played an important role in creating, reinforcing, or transforming temporal tensions. The authors conclude by providing implications for theory and practice.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Title of host publication | Tensions and paradoxes in temporary organizing |
Volume | 67 |
Publisher | Emerald Group Publishing |
Publication date | 2020 |
Pages | 81-103 |
Publication status | Published - 2020 |
Series | Research in the Sociology of Organizations |
---|---|
ISSN | 0733-558X |