Acceptance of speech recognition by physicians: A survey of expectations, experiences, and social influence

Alexandre Alapetite, Henning Boje Andersen, Morten Hertzum

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    Abstract

    The present study has surveyed physician views and attitudes before and after the introduction of speech technology as a front end to an electronic medical record. At the hospital where the survey was made, speech technology recently (2006–2007) replaced traditional dictation and subsequent secretarial transcription for all physicians in clinical departments. The aim of the survey was (i) to identify how attitudes and perceptions among physicians affected the acceptance and success of the speech-recognition system and the new work procedures associated with it; and (ii) to assess the degree to which physicians’ attitudes and expectations to the use of speech technology changed after actually using it. The survey was based on two questionnaires—one administered when the physicians were about to begin training with the speech-recognition system and another, asking similar questions, when they had had some experience with the system. The survey data were supplemented with performance data from the speech-recognition system. The results show that the surveyed physicians tended to report a more negative view of the system after having used it for some months than before. When judging the system retrospectively, physicians are approximately evenly divided between those who think it was a good idea to introduce speech recognition (33%), those who think it was not (31%) and those who are neutral (36%). In particular, the physicians felt that they spent much more time producing medical records than before, including time correcting the speech recognition, and that the overall quality of records had declined. Nevertheless, workflow improvements and the possibility to access the records immediately after dictation were almost unanimously appreciated. Physicians’ affinity with the system seems to be quite dependent on their perception of the associated new work procedures.
    Original languageEnglish
    JournalInternational Journal of Human-Computer Studies
    Volume67
    Issue number1
    Pages (from-to)36-49
    ISSN1071-5819
    DOIs
    Publication statusPublished - 2009

    Keywords

    • Speech recognition
    • Electronic medical records
    • Technology acceptance

    Cite this

    @article{ffe6a162416b48eba313c4e354eb8822,
    title = "Acceptance of speech recognition by physicians: A survey of expectations, experiences, and social influence",
    abstract = "The present study has surveyed physician views and attitudes before and after the introduction of speech technology as a front end to an electronic medical record. At the hospital where the survey was made, speech technology recently (2006–2007) replaced traditional dictation and subsequent secretarial transcription for all physicians in clinical departments. The aim of the survey was (i) to identify how attitudes and perceptions among physicians affected the acceptance and success of the speech-recognition system and the new work procedures associated with it; and (ii) to assess the degree to which physicians’ attitudes and expectations to the use of speech technology changed after actually using it. The survey was based on two questionnaires—one administered when the physicians were about to begin training with the speech-recognition system and another, asking similar questions, when they had had some experience with the system. The survey data were supplemented with performance data from the speech-recognition system. The results show that the surveyed physicians tended to report a more negative view of the system after having used it for some months than before. When judging the system retrospectively, physicians are approximately evenly divided between those who think it was a good idea to introduce speech recognition (33{\%}), those who think it was not (31{\%}) and those who are neutral (36{\%}). In particular, the physicians felt that they spent much more time producing medical records than before, including time correcting the speech recognition, and that the overall quality of records had declined. Nevertheless, workflow improvements and the possibility to access the records immediately after dictation were almost unanimously appreciated. Physicians’ affinity with the system seems to be quite dependent on their perception of the associated new work procedures.",
    keywords = "Speech recognition, Electronic medical records, Technology acceptance",
    author = "Alexandre Alapetite and Andersen, {Henning Boje} and Morten Hertzum",
    year = "2009",
    doi = "10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.004",
    language = "English",
    volume = "67",
    pages = "36--49",
    journal = "International Journal of Human-Computer Studies",
    issn = "1071-5819",
    publisher = "Academic Press",
    number = "1",

    }

    Acceptance of speech recognition by physicians: A survey of expectations, experiences, and social influence. / Alapetite, Alexandre; Andersen, Henning Boje; Hertzum, Morten.

    In: International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 67, No. 1, 2009, p. 36-49.

    Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

    TY - JOUR

    T1 - Acceptance of speech recognition by physicians: A survey of expectations, experiences, and social influence

    AU - Alapetite, Alexandre

    AU - Andersen, Henning Boje

    AU - Hertzum, Morten

    PY - 2009

    Y1 - 2009

    N2 - The present study has surveyed physician views and attitudes before and after the introduction of speech technology as a front end to an electronic medical record. At the hospital where the survey was made, speech technology recently (2006–2007) replaced traditional dictation and subsequent secretarial transcription for all physicians in clinical departments. The aim of the survey was (i) to identify how attitudes and perceptions among physicians affected the acceptance and success of the speech-recognition system and the new work procedures associated with it; and (ii) to assess the degree to which physicians’ attitudes and expectations to the use of speech technology changed after actually using it. The survey was based on two questionnaires—one administered when the physicians were about to begin training with the speech-recognition system and another, asking similar questions, when they had had some experience with the system. The survey data were supplemented with performance data from the speech-recognition system. The results show that the surveyed physicians tended to report a more negative view of the system after having used it for some months than before. When judging the system retrospectively, physicians are approximately evenly divided between those who think it was a good idea to introduce speech recognition (33%), those who think it was not (31%) and those who are neutral (36%). In particular, the physicians felt that they spent much more time producing medical records than before, including time correcting the speech recognition, and that the overall quality of records had declined. Nevertheless, workflow improvements and the possibility to access the records immediately after dictation were almost unanimously appreciated. Physicians’ affinity with the system seems to be quite dependent on their perception of the associated new work procedures.

    AB - The present study has surveyed physician views and attitudes before and after the introduction of speech technology as a front end to an electronic medical record. At the hospital where the survey was made, speech technology recently (2006–2007) replaced traditional dictation and subsequent secretarial transcription for all physicians in clinical departments. The aim of the survey was (i) to identify how attitudes and perceptions among physicians affected the acceptance and success of the speech-recognition system and the new work procedures associated with it; and (ii) to assess the degree to which physicians’ attitudes and expectations to the use of speech technology changed after actually using it. The survey was based on two questionnaires—one administered when the physicians were about to begin training with the speech-recognition system and another, asking similar questions, when they had had some experience with the system. The survey data were supplemented with performance data from the speech-recognition system. The results show that the surveyed physicians tended to report a more negative view of the system after having used it for some months than before. When judging the system retrospectively, physicians are approximately evenly divided between those who think it was a good idea to introduce speech recognition (33%), those who think it was not (31%) and those who are neutral (36%). In particular, the physicians felt that they spent much more time producing medical records than before, including time correcting the speech recognition, and that the overall quality of records had declined. Nevertheless, workflow improvements and the possibility to access the records immediately after dictation were almost unanimously appreciated. Physicians’ affinity with the system seems to be quite dependent on their perception of the associated new work procedures.

    KW - Speech recognition

    KW - Electronic medical records

    KW - Technology acceptance

    U2 - 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.004

    DO - 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2008.08.004

    M3 - Journal article

    VL - 67

    SP - 36

    EP - 49

    JO - International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

    JF - International Journal of Human-Computer Studies

    SN - 1071-5819

    IS - 1

    ER -