TY - JOUR
T1 - A systematic review of operating room ventilation
AU - Sadrizadeh, Sasan
AU - Aganovic, Amar
AU - Bogdan, Anna
AU - Wang, Cong
AU - Afshari, Alireza
AU - Hartmann, Anne
AU - Croitoru, Cristiana
AU - Khan, Amirul
AU - Kriegel, Martin
AU - Lind, Merethe
AU - Liu, Zhijian
AU - Melikov, Arsen
AU - Mo, Jinhan
AU - Rotheudt, Hansjörg
AU - Yao, Runming
AU - Zhang, Yixian
AU - Abouali, Omid
AU - Langvatn, Håkon
AU - Sköldenberg, Olof
AU - Cao, Guangyu
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Ventilation systems are the primary way of eliminating airborne pathogenic particles in an operating room (OR). However, such systems can be complex due to factors such as different surgical instruments, diverse room sizes, various staff counts, types of clothing used, different surgical types and duration, medications, and patient conditions. OR ventilation should provide a thermally comfortable environment for the surgical staff team members while preventing the patient from suffering from any extreme hypothermia. Many technical, logistical, and ethical implications need to be considered in the early stage of designing a ventilation system for an OR. Years of research and a significant number of publications have highlighted the controversy and disagreement among infection specialists, design engineers, and ventilation experts in this context. This review article aims to provide a good understanding of OR ventilation systems in the context of air quality and infection control from existing research and provide multidimensional insights for appropriate design and operation of the OR. To this end, we have conducted a systematic review of the literature, covering 253 articles in this context. Systematic review and meta-analyses were used to map the evidence and identify research gaps in the existing clinical, practical, and engineering knowledge. The present study is categorized into six research focuses: ventilation system, thermal comfort, staff work practice and obstacles, door operation and passage, air cleaning technology, emission rate, and clothing systems. In the conclusion, we summarize the key limitations of the existing studies and insights for future research direction.
AB - Ventilation systems are the primary way of eliminating airborne pathogenic particles in an operating room (OR). However, such systems can be complex due to factors such as different surgical instruments, diverse room sizes, various staff counts, types of clothing used, different surgical types and duration, medications, and patient conditions. OR ventilation should provide a thermally comfortable environment for the surgical staff team members while preventing the patient from suffering from any extreme hypothermia. Many technical, logistical, and ethical implications need to be considered in the early stage of designing a ventilation system for an OR. Years of research and a significant number of publications have highlighted the controversy and disagreement among infection specialists, design engineers, and ventilation experts in this context. This review article aims to provide a good understanding of OR ventilation systems in the context of air quality and infection control from existing research and provide multidimensional insights for appropriate design and operation of the OR. To this end, we have conducted a systematic review of the literature, covering 253 articles in this context. Systematic review and meta-analyses were used to map the evidence and identify research gaps in the existing clinical, practical, and engineering knowledge. The present study is categorized into six research focuses: ventilation system, thermal comfort, staff work practice and obstacles, door operation and passage, air cleaning technology, emission rate, and clothing systems. In the conclusion, we summarize the key limitations of the existing studies and insights for future research direction.
KW - Hospital operating room
KW - Indoor air quality
KW - Infection control
KW - Source strength
KW - Surgical clothing system
KW - Thermal comfort
U2 - 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102693
DO - 10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102693
M3 - Review
AN - SCOPUS:85106879363
SN - 2352-7102
VL - 40
JO - Journal of Building Engineering
JF - Journal of Building Engineering
M1 - 102693
ER -