A synthesis of major environmental-body size clines of the sexes within arthropod species

Curtis R. Horne, Andrew G. Hirst*, David Atkinson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

47 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Body size at maturity often varies with environmental conditions, as well as between males and females within a species [termed Sexual Size Dimorphism (SSD)]. Variation in body size clines between the sexes can determine the degree to which SSD varies across environmental gradients. We use a meta-analytic approach to investigate whether major biogeographical and temporal (intra-annually across seasons) body size clines differ systematically between the sexes in arthropods. We consider 329 intra-specific environmental gradients in adult body size across latitude, altitude and with seasonal temperature variation, representing 126 arthropod species from 16 taxonomic orders. On average, we observe greater variability in male than female body size across latitude, consistent with the hypothesis that, over evolutionary time, directional selection has acted more strongly on male than female size. In contrast, neither sex exhibits consistently greater proportional changes in body size than the other sex across altitudinal or seasonal gradients, akin to earlier findings for plastic temperature-size responses measured in the laboratory. Variation in the degree to which body size gradients differ between the sexes cannot be explained by a range of potentially influential factors, including environment type (aquatic vs. terrestrial), voltinism, mean species’ body size, degree of SSD, or gradient direction. Ultimately, if we are to make better sense of the patterns (or lack thereof) in SSD across environmental gradients, we require a more detailed understanding of the underlying selective pressures driving clines in body size. Such understanding will provide a more comprehensive hypothesis-driven approach to explaining biogeographical and temporal variation in SSD.
Original languageEnglish
JournalOecologia
Volume190
Issue number2
Pages (from-to)343-353
ISSN0029-8549
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019

Keywords

  • Altitude
  • Biogeography
  • Seasonality
  • Sexual size dimorphism
  • Temperature

Cite this

Horne, Curtis R. ; Hirst, Andrew G. ; Atkinson, David. / A synthesis of major environmental-body size clines of the sexes within arthropod species. In: Oecologia. 2019 ; Vol. 190, No. 2. pp. 343-353.
@article{a92b6a4fc10e4a2d98ad2d8d4608abe9,
title = "A synthesis of major environmental-body size clines of the sexes within arthropod species",
abstract = "Body size at maturity often varies with environmental conditions, as well as between males and females within a species [termed Sexual Size Dimorphism (SSD)]. Variation in body size clines between the sexes can determine the degree to which SSD varies across environmental gradients. We use a meta-analytic approach to investigate whether major biogeographical and temporal (intra-annually across seasons) body size clines differ systematically between the sexes in arthropods. We consider 329 intra-specific environmental gradients in adult body size across latitude, altitude and with seasonal temperature variation, representing 126 arthropod species from 16 taxonomic orders. On average, we observe greater variability in male than female body size across latitude, consistent with the hypothesis that, over evolutionary time, directional selection has acted more strongly on male than female size. In contrast, neither sex exhibits consistently greater proportional changes in body size than the other sex across altitudinal or seasonal gradients, akin to earlier findings for plastic temperature-size responses measured in the laboratory. Variation in the degree to which body size gradients differ between the sexes cannot be explained by a range of potentially influential factors, including environment type (aquatic vs. terrestrial), voltinism, mean species’ body size, degree of SSD, or gradient direction. Ultimately, if we are to make better sense of the patterns (or lack thereof) in SSD across environmental gradients, we require a more detailed understanding of the underlying selective pressures driving clines in body size. Such understanding will provide a more comprehensive hypothesis-driven approach to explaining biogeographical and temporal variation in SSD.",
keywords = "Altitude, Biogeography, Seasonality, Sexual size dimorphism, Temperature",
author = "Horne, {Curtis R.} and Hirst, {Andrew G.} and David Atkinson",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/s00442-019-04428-7",
language = "English",
volume = "190",
pages = "343--353",
journal = "Oecologia",
issn = "0029-8549",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "2",

}

A synthesis of major environmental-body size clines of the sexes within arthropod species. / Horne, Curtis R.; Hirst, Andrew G.; Atkinson, David.

In: Oecologia, Vol. 190, No. 2, 2019, p. 343-353.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A synthesis of major environmental-body size clines of the sexes within arthropod species

AU - Horne, Curtis R.

AU - Hirst, Andrew G.

AU - Atkinson, David

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - Body size at maturity often varies with environmental conditions, as well as between males and females within a species [termed Sexual Size Dimorphism (SSD)]. Variation in body size clines between the sexes can determine the degree to which SSD varies across environmental gradients. We use a meta-analytic approach to investigate whether major biogeographical and temporal (intra-annually across seasons) body size clines differ systematically between the sexes in arthropods. We consider 329 intra-specific environmental gradients in adult body size across latitude, altitude and with seasonal temperature variation, representing 126 arthropod species from 16 taxonomic orders. On average, we observe greater variability in male than female body size across latitude, consistent with the hypothesis that, over evolutionary time, directional selection has acted more strongly on male than female size. In contrast, neither sex exhibits consistently greater proportional changes in body size than the other sex across altitudinal or seasonal gradients, akin to earlier findings for plastic temperature-size responses measured in the laboratory. Variation in the degree to which body size gradients differ between the sexes cannot be explained by a range of potentially influential factors, including environment type (aquatic vs. terrestrial), voltinism, mean species’ body size, degree of SSD, or gradient direction. Ultimately, if we are to make better sense of the patterns (or lack thereof) in SSD across environmental gradients, we require a more detailed understanding of the underlying selective pressures driving clines in body size. Such understanding will provide a more comprehensive hypothesis-driven approach to explaining biogeographical and temporal variation in SSD.

AB - Body size at maturity often varies with environmental conditions, as well as between males and females within a species [termed Sexual Size Dimorphism (SSD)]. Variation in body size clines between the sexes can determine the degree to which SSD varies across environmental gradients. We use a meta-analytic approach to investigate whether major biogeographical and temporal (intra-annually across seasons) body size clines differ systematically between the sexes in arthropods. We consider 329 intra-specific environmental gradients in adult body size across latitude, altitude and with seasonal temperature variation, representing 126 arthropod species from 16 taxonomic orders. On average, we observe greater variability in male than female body size across latitude, consistent with the hypothesis that, over evolutionary time, directional selection has acted more strongly on male than female size. In contrast, neither sex exhibits consistently greater proportional changes in body size than the other sex across altitudinal or seasonal gradients, akin to earlier findings for plastic temperature-size responses measured in the laboratory. Variation in the degree to which body size gradients differ between the sexes cannot be explained by a range of potentially influential factors, including environment type (aquatic vs. terrestrial), voltinism, mean species’ body size, degree of SSD, or gradient direction. Ultimately, if we are to make better sense of the patterns (or lack thereof) in SSD across environmental gradients, we require a more detailed understanding of the underlying selective pressures driving clines in body size. Such understanding will provide a more comprehensive hypothesis-driven approach to explaining biogeographical and temporal variation in SSD.

KW - Altitude

KW - Biogeography

KW - Seasonality

KW - Sexual size dimorphism

KW - Temperature

U2 - 10.1007/s00442-019-04428-7

DO - 10.1007/s00442-019-04428-7

M3 - Journal article

VL - 190

SP - 343

EP - 353

JO - Oecologia

JF - Oecologia

SN - 0029-8549

IS - 2

ER -