A study of teachers’ reflections on teaching and learning

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

76 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

According to Schön [1] professional knowledge is to a high degree based on tacit knowledge. For university teachers, tacit knowledge includes knowledge about what works – and what does not work - when teaching a specific class of students a specific subject in a specific context. However, it is important to make tacit knowledge explicit for at least two reasons: Firstly, for the individual teacher it may support a more conscious linking of observations and experiences from own teaching practice to general principles of teaching and learning. This linking could enable a systematic analysis and development of own teaching in order to improve student learning [2]. Secondly, it is also beneficial to make one’s tacit knowledge explicit in order to discuss teaching and learning with other persons, e.g. during peer coaching of less experienced colleagues, or collaboration on teaching development with colleagues. This unfortunately seldom takes place and leaves teachers in a limbo of solidarity. Therefore, the authors have developed a board game for university teachers to articulate and share their reflections on teaching and learning in a collective process. The game consists of a board and a deck of cards, where each card contains a statement related to teaching and/or learning. The purposes of the game are to support a team-oriented approach to teaching and thereby to strengthen communities of teaching practices [3], i.e. to develop groups of colleagues, who acknowledge the individual team members’ different ways of teaching and how a manifold of teaching practices fertilises the students’ building of skills, competences and attitudes towards becoming professional engineers.The game has been played at two international engineering education conferences, at an annual education day at a university abroad, and at several faculty meetings at the authors’ university. Data have been collected on the selection and ranking of cards. These represent the players’ reflections on teaching practices and learning, and on consensus reached within groups of players – reflections which influence and are influenced by teaching practice. This paper documents an explorative study of the players’ reflections on teaching and learning based on the selected and ranked cards. In this first study the data has been analysed focusing on the following two questions: What kinds of attitudes towards teaching and learning do the selected cards represent? And which cards are selected most often?
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018
EditorsRobin Clark, Peter Munkebo Hussmann, Hannu-Matti Järvinen, Mike Murphy, Martin Etchells Vigild
PublisherEuropean Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)
Publication date2018
Pages832 – 839
ISBN (Electronic)978-2-87352-016-8
Publication statusPublished - 2018
Event46th SEFI Annual Conference - Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
Duration: 17 Sep 201821 Sep 2018

Conference

Conference46th SEFI Annual Conference
LocationTechnical University of Denmark
CountryDenmark
CityKgs. Lyngby
Period17/09/201821/09/2018

Keywords

  • Teaching philosophy
  • Good teaching
  • Teaching and learning
  • Gamification

Cite this

Hansen, C. T., & Jensen, L. B. (2018). A study of teachers’ reflections on teaching and learning. In R. Clark, P. M. Hussmann, H-M. Järvinen, M. Murphy, & M. E. Vigild (Eds.), Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018 (pp. 832 – 839). European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI).
Hansen, C. T. ; Jensen, L. B. / A study of teachers’ reflections on teaching and learning. Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018. editor / Robin Clark ; Peter Munkebo Hussmann ; Hannu-Matti Järvinen ; Mike Murphy ; Martin Etchells Vigild. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), 2018. pp. 832 – 839
@inproceedings{d3dfe25deb79495fa305eec3165b109d,
title = "A study of teachers’ reflections on teaching and learning",
abstract = "According to Sch{\"o}n [1] professional knowledge is to a high degree based on tacit knowledge. For university teachers, tacit knowledge includes knowledge about what works – and what does not work - when teaching a specific class of students a specific subject in a specific context. However, it is important to make tacit knowledge explicit for at least two reasons: Firstly, for the individual teacher it may support a more conscious linking of observations and experiences from own teaching practice to general principles of teaching and learning. This linking could enable a systematic analysis and development of own teaching in order to improve student learning [2]. Secondly, it is also beneficial to make one’s tacit knowledge explicit in order to discuss teaching and learning with other persons, e.g. during peer coaching of less experienced colleagues, or collaboration on teaching development with colleagues. This unfortunately seldom takes place and leaves teachers in a limbo of solidarity. Therefore, the authors have developed a board game for university teachers to articulate and share their reflections on teaching and learning in a collective process. The game consists of a board and a deck of cards, where each card contains a statement related to teaching and/or learning. The purposes of the game are to support a team-oriented approach to teaching and thereby to strengthen communities of teaching practices [3], i.e. to develop groups of colleagues, who acknowledge the individual team members’ different ways of teaching and how a manifold of teaching practices fertilises the students’ building of skills, competences and attitudes towards becoming professional engineers.The game has been played at two international engineering education conferences, at an annual education day at a university abroad, and at several faculty meetings at the authors’ university. Data have been collected on the selection and ranking of cards. These represent the players’ reflections on teaching practices and learning, and on consensus reached within groups of players – reflections which influence and are influenced by teaching practice. This paper documents an explorative study of the players’ reflections on teaching and learning based on the selected and ranked cards. In this first study the data has been analysed focusing on the following two questions: What kinds of attitudes towards teaching and learning do the selected cards represent? And which cards are selected most often?",
keywords = "Teaching philosophy, Good teaching, Teaching and learning, Gamification",
author = "Hansen, {C. T.} and Jensen, {L. B.}",
year = "2018",
language = "English",
pages = "832 – 839",
editor = "Robin Clark and Hussmann, {Peter Munkebo } and Hannu-Matti J{\"a}rvinen and Murphy, {Mike } and Vigild, {Martin Etchells}",
booktitle = "Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018",
publisher = "European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)",

}

Hansen, CT & Jensen, LB 2018, A study of teachers’ reflections on teaching and learning. in R Clark, PM Hussmann, H-M Järvinen, M Murphy & ME Vigild (eds), Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), pp. 832 – 839, 46th SEFI Annual Conference, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark, 17/09/2018.

A study of teachers’ reflections on teaching and learning. / Hansen, C. T.; Jensen, L. B.

Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018. ed. / Robin Clark; Peter Munkebo Hussmann; Hannu-Matti Järvinen; Mike Murphy; Martin Etchells Vigild. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI), 2018. p. 832 – 839.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - A study of teachers’ reflections on teaching and learning

AU - Hansen, C. T.

AU - Jensen, L. B.

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - According to Schön [1] professional knowledge is to a high degree based on tacit knowledge. For university teachers, tacit knowledge includes knowledge about what works – and what does not work - when teaching a specific class of students a specific subject in a specific context. However, it is important to make tacit knowledge explicit for at least two reasons: Firstly, for the individual teacher it may support a more conscious linking of observations and experiences from own teaching practice to general principles of teaching and learning. This linking could enable a systematic analysis and development of own teaching in order to improve student learning [2]. Secondly, it is also beneficial to make one’s tacit knowledge explicit in order to discuss teaching and learning with other persons, e.g. during peer coaching of less experienced colleagues, or collaboration on teaching development with colleagues. This unfortunately seldom takes place and leaves teachers in a limbo of solidarity. Therefore, the authors have developed a board game for university teachers to articulate and share their reflections on teaching and learning in a collective process. The game consists of a board and a deck of cards, where each card contains a statement related to teaching and/or learning. The purposes of the game are to support a team-oriented approach to teaching and thereby to strengthen communities of teaching practices [3], i.e. to develop groups of colleagues, who acknowledge the individual team members’ different ways of teaching and how a manifold of teaching practices fertilises the students’ building of skills, competences and attitudes towards becoming professional engineers.The game has been played at two international engineering education conferences, at an annual education day at a university abroad, and at several faculty meetings at the authors’ university. Data have been collected on the selection and ranking of cards. These represent the players’ reflections on teaching practices and learning, and on consensus reached within groups of players – reflections which influence and are influenced by teaching practice. This paper documents an explorative study of the players’ reflections on teaching and learning based on the selected and ranked cards. In this first study the data has been analysed focusing on the following two questions: What kinds of attitudes towards teaching and learning do the selected cards represent? And which cards are selected most often?

AB - According to Schön [1] professional knowledge is to a high degree based on tacit knowledge. For university teachers, tacit knowledge includes knowledge about what works – and what does not work - when teaching a specific class of students a specific subject in a specific context. However, it is important to make tacit knowledge explicit for at least two reasons: Firstly, for the individual teacher it may support a more conscious linking of observations and experiences from own teaching practice to general principles of teaching and learning. This linking could enable a systematic analysis and development of own teaching in order to improve student learning [2]. Secondly, it is also beneficial to make one’s tacit knowledge explicit in order to discuss teaching and learning with other persons, e.g. during peer coaching of less experienced colleagues, or collaboration on teaching development with colleagues. This unfortunately seldom takes place and leaves teachers in a limbo of solidarity. Therefore, the authors have developed a board game for university teachers to articulate and share their reflections on teaching and learning in a collective process. The game consists of a board and a deck of cards, where each card contains a statement related to teaching and/or learning. The purposes of the game are to support a team-oriented approach to teaching and thereby to strengthen communities of teaching practices [3], i.e. to develop groups of colleagues, who acknowledge the individual team members’ different ways of teaching and how a manifold of teaching practices fertilises the students’ building of skills, competences and attitudes towards becoming professional engineers.The game has been played at two international engineering education conferences, at an annual education day at a university abroad, and at several faculty meetings at the authors’ university. Data have been collected on the selection and ranking of cards. These represent the players’ reflections on teaching practices and learning, and on consensus reached within groups of players – reflections which influence and are influenced by teaching practice. This paper documents an explorative study of the players’ reflections on teaching and learning based on the selected and ranked cards. In this first study the data has been analysed focusing on the following two questions: What kinds of attitudes towards teaching and learning do the selected cards represent? And which cards are selected most often?

KW - Teaching philosophy

KW - Good teaching

KW - Teaching and learning

KW - Gamification

M3 - Article in proceedings

SP - 832

EP - 839

BT - Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018

A2 - Clark, Robin

A2 - Hussmann, Peter Munkebo

A2 - Järvinen, Hannu-Matti

A2 - Murphy, Mike

A2 - Vigild, Martin Etchells

PB - European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI)

ER -

Hansen CT, Jensen LB. A study of teachers’ reflections on teaching and learning. In Clark R, Hussmann PM, Järvinen H-M, Murphy M, Vigild ME, editors, Proceedings of the 46th SEFI Annual Conference 2018. European Society for Engineering Education (SEFI). 2018. p. 832 – 839