A review of recent research on catalytic biomass pyrolysis and low pressure hydropyrolysis

Andreas Claudius Eschenbacher, Paul Fennell, Anker Degn Jensen*

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Direct catalytic upgrading of biomass-derived fast pyrolysis vapors can occur in different process configurations, under either inert or hydrogen-containing atmospheres. This review summarizes the myriad of different catalysts studied, and benchmarks their deoxygenation performance by also taking into account the resulting decrease in bio-oil yield compared to a thermal pyrolysis oil. Generally, catalyst modifications aim at either improving the initial selectivity of the catalyst to more desirable oxygen-free hydrocarbons, and/or to improve the catalysts’ stability against deactivation by coking. Optimizing pore structure and acid site density/distribution of solid acid catalysts can slow down deactivation and prolong activity. Basic catalysts such as MgO and Na2O/ϒ-Al2O3 are excellent ketonization catalysts favoring oxygen removal via decarboxylation, whereas solid acid catalysts such as zeolites primarily favor decarbonylation and dehydration. Basic catalysts can therefore produce bio-oils with higher H/C ratios. However, since their coke formation per surface area is higher, compared to microporous HZSM-5 zeolite, pre-coking (or imperfect regeneration) of these basic catalysts and operating for longer time-on-stream can be approaches to improve the oil yield. In-line vapor-phase upgrading with a dual bed comprising a solid acid catalyst followed by a basic catalyst active in ketonization and aldol condensation further improves deoxygenation, while maintaining high bio-oil carbon recovery. Also low-cost catalysts such as iron-rich red mud have deoxygenation activity. An improved bio-oil carbon recovery— compared at similar level of oxygen removal—can be obtained when changing from an inert atmosphere to a hydrogen-containing atmosphere and using an effective hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) catalyst. To keep costs low, this can be conducted at near-atmospheric pressure conditions. Pt/TiO2 and MoO3/TiO2 showed high activity and reduced coke formation. Stable performance has been demonstrated using Pt/TiO2 for 100+ reaction/regeneration cycles with woody biomass feedstock. If future works can demonstrate the same durability for lower cost biomass containing higher contents of ash, N, and S, this would considerably boost the commercial viability of near atmospheric pressure HDO. Further research should be directed into testing the durability of lower cost HDO catalysts such as MoO3/TiO2 and further improving the activity and stability of lower cost catalysts.
Original languageEnglish
JournalEnergy & Fuels
Volume35
Issue number22
Pages (from-to)18333–18369
ISSN0887-0624
Publication statusPublished - 2021

Keywords

  • Renewables
  • Bio-fuel
  • Catalyst
  • Solid acid
  • HDO
  • Zeolite
  • Metal oxide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A review of recent research on catalytic biomass pyrolysis and low pressure hydropyrolysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this