Abstract
This paper discusses methods for assessment of ultrasound image quality based on our experiences with evaluating new methods for anatomic imaging. It presents a methodology to ensure a fair assessment between competing imaging methods using clinically relevant evaluations. The methodology is valuable in the continuing process of method optimization and guided development of new imaging methods. It includes a three phased study plan covering from initial prototype development to clinical assessment. Recommendations to the clinical assessment protocol, software, and statistical analysis are presented. Earlier uses of the methodology has shown that it ensures validity of the assessment, as it separates the influences between developer, investigator, and assessor once a research protocol has been established. This separation reduces confounding influences on the result from the developer to properly reveal the clinical value. The paper exemplifies the methodology using recent studies of Synthetic Aperture Sequential Beamforming tissue harmonic imaging.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | I E E E Transactions on Ultrasonics, Ferroelectrics and Frequency Control |
Volume | 64 |
Issue number | 1 |
Number of pages | 12 |
ISSN | 0885-3010 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2017 |
Bibliographical note
(c) 2016 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other users, including reprinting/ republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted components of this work in other works.Keywords
- Imaging
- Image quality
- Ultrasonic imaging
- Medical services
- Optimization
- Prototypes
- Protocols