A Frequency Splitting Method For CFM Imaging

Jesper Udesen, Fredrik Gran, Jørgen Arendt Jensen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The performance of conventional CFM imaging will often be degraded due to the relatively low number of pulses (4-10) used for each velocity estimate. To circumvent this problem we propose a new method using frequency splitting (FS). The FS method uses broad band chirps as excitation pulses instead of narrow band pulses as in conventional CFM imaging. By appropriate filtration, the returned signals are divided into a number of narrow band signals which are approximately disjoint. After clutter filtering the velocities are found from each frequency band using a conventional autocorrelation estimator. Finally the velocity estimates from each frequency band are averaged to obtain an improved velocity estimate. The FS method has been evaluated in simulations using the Field II program and in flow phantom experiments using the experimental ultrasound scanner RASMUS. In both simulations and experiments, a 5 MHz linear array transducer was used to scan a vessel situated at 30 mm depth with a maximum flow velocity of 0.1 m/s. The pulse repetition frequency was 1.8 kHz and the angle between the flow and the beam was 60 deg. A 15 mus chirp was used as excitation pulse and 40 independent velocity estimates were obtained using the FS method with 10 pulse transmissions used for each estimate. For comparison, a 8 cycles sinusoid pulse at 5 MHz was used to acquire 40 independent velocity estimates, each derived from 10 pulse emissions. Here the velocity was found using a conventional autocorrelation estimator. In the simulation, the relative mean standard deviation of the velocity estimates over the vessel was 2.43% when using the FD method and the relative mean absolute bias was 1.84%. For the reference 8 oscillation pulse, the relative mean standard deviation over the vessel was 4.91 % and the relative mean absolute bias was 1.78%. In the experiments the relative mean standard deviation of the velocity estimates over the vessel was 2.41 % when using the FD method and the relative- mean absolute bias was 1.56%. For the reference 8 oscillation pulse, the relative mean standard deviation over the vessel was 4.76% and the relative mean absolute bias was 3.12%.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationProceedings of the IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
PublisherIEEE
Publication date2006
Pages2019-2022
ISBN (Print)1-4244-0201-8
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2006
Event2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium - Vancouver, Canada
Duration: 2 Oct 20066 Oct 2006
http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/mostRecentIssue.jsp?punumber=4151855

Conference

Conference2006 IEEE Ultrasonics Symposium
CountryCanada
CityVancouver
Period02/10/200606/10/2006
Internet address

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A Frequency Splitting Method For CFM Imaging'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this