A field evaluation of long-term effects of PIT tagging

Christian Skov; Joan Holst Hansen; Henrik Baktoft; Christer Brönmark; Jakob Brodersen; Ben B Chapman; Lars-Anders Hansson; Kaj Hulthén; P Anders Nilsson

doi:10.1111/jfb.14292

A field evaluation of long-term effects of PIT tagging

Christian Skov^*
, Joan Holst Hansen
, Henrik Baktoft
, Christer Brönmark
, Jakob Brodersen
, Ben B Chapman
, Lars-Anders Hansson
, Kaj Hulthén
, P Anders Nilsson

^*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review

202 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

PIT-tagging is commonly used in behavioural studies of fish, although long-term evaluations of effects from tagging under natural conditions are scarce. We PIT-tagged common bream Abramis brama, European perch Perca fluviatilis, pike Esox lucius and roach Rutilus rutilus, released them in their lakes of origin and recaptured them after 103-3269 days. Overall, tagged fish did not differ in condition from non-tagged fish, except for small R. rutilus that weighed less in one lake in one year. We conclude that PIT-tagging in general has negligible long-term effects on fish condition. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Original language	English
Journal	Journal of Fish Biology
Volume	96
Issue number	4
Pages (from-to)	1055-1059
Number of pages	5
ISSN	0022-1112
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.14292
Publication status	Published - 2020

Access to Document

10.1111/jfb.14292

FulltextAccepted author manuscript, 336 KB

OpenUrl availability

Full text

Cite this

@article{2cf4769e019a4d48af370383867bbb9c,

title = "A field evaluation of long-term effects of PIT tagging",

abstract = "PIT-tagging is commonly used in behavioural studies of fish, although long-term evaluations of effects from tagging under natural conditions are scarce. We PIT-tagged common bream Abramis brama, European perch Perca fluviatilis, pike Esox lucius and roach Rutilus rutilus, released them in their lakes of origin and recaptured them after 103-3269 days. Overall, tagged fish did not differ in condition from non-tagged fish, except for small R. rutilus that weighed less in one lake in one year. We conclude that PIT-tagging in general has negligible long-term effects on fish condition. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.",

author = "Christian Skov and Hansen, \{Joan Holst\} and Henrik Baktoft and Christer Br{\"o}nmark and Jakob Brodersen and Chapman, \{Ben B\} and Lars-Anders Hansson and Kaj Hulth{\'e}n and Nilsson, \{P Anders\}",

year = "2020",

doi = "10.1111/jfb.14292",

language = "English",

volume = "96",

pages = "1055--1059",

journal = "Journal of Fish Biology",

issn = "0022-1112",

publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",

number = "4",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A field evaluation of long-term effects of PIT tagging

AU - Skov, Christian

AU - Hansen, Joan Holst

AU - Baktoft, Henrik

AU - Brönmark, Christer

AU - Brodersen, Jakob

AU - Chapman, Ben B

AU - Hansson, Lars-Anders

AU - Hulthén, Kaj

AU - Nilsson, P Anders

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - PIT-tagging is commonly used in behavioural studies of fish, although long-term evaluations of effects from tagging under natural conditions are scarce. We PIT-tagged common bream Abramis brama, European perch Perca fluviatilis, pike Esox lucius and roach Rutilus rutilus, released them in their lakes of origin and recaptured them after 103-3269 days. Overall, tagged fish did not differ in condition from non-tagged fish, except for small R. rutilus that weighed less in one lake in one year. We conclude that PIT-tagging in general has negligible long-term effects on fish condition. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

AB - PIT-tagging is commonly used in behavioural studies of fish, although long-term evaluations of effects from tagging under natural conditions are scarce. We PIT-tagged common bream Abramis brama, European perch Perca fluviatilis, pike Esox lucius and roach Rutilus rutilus, released them in their lakes of origin and recaptured them after 103-3269 days. Overall, tagged fish did not differ in condition from non-tagged fish, except for small R. rutilus that weighed less in one lake in one year. We conclude that PIT-tagging in general has negligible long-term effects on fish condition. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

U2 - 10.1111/jfb.14292

DO - 10.1111/jfb.14292

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32060922

SN - 0022-1112

VL - 96

SP - 1055

EP - 1059

JO - Journal of Fish Biology

JF - Journal of Fish Biology

IS - 4

ER -

A field evaluation of long-term effects of PIT tagging

Abstract

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this