TY - JOUR
T1 - A Critical Look at Organic Photovoltaic Fabrication Methodology: Defining Performance Enhancement Parameters Relative to Active Area
AU - Rozanski, L.J.
AU - Smith, Chris T.G.
AU - Gandhi, Keyur K.
AU - Beliatis, Michail
AU - Dabera, G. Dinesha M.R.
AU - Jayawardena, K.D.G. Imalka
AU - Adikaari, A.A. Damitha T.
AU - Kearney, Michael J.
AU - Silva, S. Ravi P.
PY - 2014
Y1 - 2014
N2 - With the ever-increasing focus on obtaining higher device power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) for
organic photovoltaics (OPV), there is a need to ensure samples are measured accurately. Reproducible
results are required to compare data across different research institutions and countries and translate
these improvements to real-world production. In order to report accurate results, and additionally find
the best-practice methodology for obtaining and reporting these, we show that careful analysis of large
data sets can identify the best fabrication methodology. We demonstrate which OPV outputs are most
affected by different fabrication or measurement methods, and identify that masking effects can result in
artificially-boosted PCEs by increasing fill factor and current densities, requiring care when selecting
which mask to use. For example, our best performing devices (46% efficiency) show that the smallest
mask areas have not produced a surfeit of the highest performers, with only 11% of the top performing
devices measured using a 0.032 cm2 mask area, while 44% used the largest mask (0.64 cm2). This trend
holds true for efficiencies going down to 5%, showing that effective fabrication conditions are
reproducible with increasing mask areas, and can be translated to even larger device areas. Finally, we
emphasise the necessity for reporting the best PCE along with the average value in order to implement
changes in real-world production. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
AB - With the ever-increasing focus on obtaining higher device power conversion efficiencies (PCEs) for
organic photovoltaics (OPV), there is a need to ensure samples are measured accurately. Reproducible
results are required to compare data across different research institutions and countries and translate
these improvements to real-world production. In order to report accurate results, and additionally find
the best-practice methodology for obtaining and reporting these, we show that careful analysis of large
data sets can identify the best fabrication methodology. We demonstrate which OPV outputs are most
affected by different fabrication or measurement methods, and identify that masking effects can result in
artificially-boosted PCEs by increasing fill factor and current densities, requiring care when selecting
which mask to use. For example, our best performing devices (46% efficiency) show that the smallest
mask areas have not produced a surfeit of the highest performers, with only 11% of the top performing
devices measured using a 0.032 cm2 mask area, while 44% used the largest mask (0.64 cm2). This trend
holds true for efficiencies going down to 5%, showing that effective fabrication conditions are
reproducible with increasing mask areas, and can be translated to even larger device areas. Finally, we
emphasise the necessity for reporting the best PCE along with the average value in order to implement
changes in real-world production. © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
KW - Organic photovoltaics
KW - Organic solar cells
KW - Reproducibility
KW - Masking
KW - Efficiency
KW - Area
U2 - 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.07.054
DO - 10.1016/j.solmat.2014.07.054
M3 - Journal article
SN - 0927-0248
VL - 130
SP - 513
EP - 520
JO - Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells
JF - Solar Energy Materials & Solar Cells
ER -