A comparison between model and rule based control of a periodic activated sludge process

Steven Howard Isaacs, D. Thornberg

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Two strategies for control of nitrogen removal in an alternating activated sludge plant are compared. One is based on simple model predictions determining the cycle length at the beginning of each cycle. The other is based on simple rules relating present ammonia and nitrate concentrations. Both strategies are close in efficiency measured as effluent total (inorganic) nitrogen and both perform better than using fixed phase lengths for a test scenario describing a typical dry weather diurnal variation. After modifying the criterion functions of the rule based strategy the two strategies are found to produce equivalent controls, which means that the optimal criteria of the model based strategy can be fulfilled without the need for model predictions. (C) 1998 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
Original languageEnglish
JournalWater Science and Technology
Volume37
Issue number12
Pages (from-to)343-351
ISSN0273-1223
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1997

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'A comparison between model and rule based control of a periodic activated sludge process'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this