A Comparison between Boundary and Continuous Conduction Modes in Single Phase PFC Using 600V Range Devices

Juan Carlos Hernandez Botella; Lars Press Petersen; Michael A. E. Andersen

doi:10.1109/PEDS.2015.7203487

A Comparison between Boundary and Continuous Conduction Modes in Single Phase PFC Using 600V Range Devices

Juan Carlos Hernandez Botella
, Lars Press Petersen
, Michael A. E. Andersen

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

4187 Downloads (Orbit)

Abstract

This paper presents an analysis and comparison of boundary conduction mode (BCM) and continuous conduction mode (CCM) in single phase power factor correction (PFC) applications. The comparison is based on double pulse tester (DPT) characterization results of state-of-the-art superjunction devices in the 600V range. The measured switching energy is used to evaluate the devices performance in a conventional PFC. This data is used together with a mathematical model for prediction of the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI). This allows comparing the different devices in BCM and CCM operation modes and evaluating the performance as a function of the PFC power density and efficiency.

Original language	English
Title of host publication	Proceedings of 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS)
Publisher	IEEE
Publication date	2015
Pages	1019-1023
ISBN (Print)	9781479944033
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDS.2015.7203487
Publication status	Published - 2015
Event	2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems - The Sydney Hilton Hotel, Sydney, Australia Duration: 9 Jun 2015 → 12 Jun 2015 Conference number: 11 https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/7167742/proceeding

Conference

Conference	2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems
Number	11
Location	The Sydney Hilton Hotel
Country/Territory	Australia
City	Sydney
Period	09/06/2015 → 12/06/2015
Internet address	https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/7167742/proceeding

Keywords

Power factor correction (PFC)
Boundary (BCM)
Continuous conduction mode (CCM)
Conducted EMI
Power density
Efficiency
Evaluation

Access to Document

10.1109/PEDS.2015.7203487

A Comparison between Boundary and Continuous Conduction Modes in Single Phase PFC Using 600V Range DevicesAccepted author manuscript, 799 KB

OpenUrl availability

Check availability in DTU Findit

Cite this

@inproceedings{33f34642bd2843f8bca0a0dc40475503,

title = "A Comparison between Boundary and Continuous Conduction Modes in Single Phase PFC Using 600V Range Devices",

abstract = "This paper presents an analysis and comparison of boundary conduction mode (BCM) and continuous conduction mode (CCM) in single phase power factor correction (PFC) applications. The comparison is based on double pulse tester (DPT) characterization results of state-of-the-art superjunction devices in the 600V range. The measured switching energy is used to evaluate the devices performance in a conventional PFC. This data is used together with a mathematical model for prediction of the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI). This allows comparing the different devices in BCM and CCM operation modes and evaluating the performance as a function of the PFC power density and efficiency. ",

keywords = "Power factor correction (PFC), Boundary (BCM), Continuous conduction mode (CCM), Conducted EMI, Power density, Efficiency, Evaluation",

author = "\{Hernandez Botella\}, \{Juan Carlos\} and Petersen, \{Lars Press\} and Andersen, \{Michael A. E.\}",

year = "2015",

doi = "10.1109/PEDS.2015.7203487",

language = "English",

isbn = "9781479944033 ",

pages = "1019--1023",

booktitle = "Proceedings of 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS)",

publisher = "IEEE",

address = "United States",

note = "2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, PEDS 2015 ; Conference date: 09-06-2015 Through 12-06-2015",

url = "https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/conhome/7167742/proceeding",

}

Hernandez Botella, JC, Petersen, LP & Andersen, MAE 2015, A Comparison between Boundary and Continuous Conduction Modes in Single Phase PFC Using 600V Range Devices. in Proceedings of 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS). IEEE, pp. 1019-1023, 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 09/06/2015. https://doi.org/10.1109/PEDS.2015.7203487

A Comparison between Boundary and Continuous Conduction Modes in Single Phase PFC Using 600V Range Devices. / Hernandez Botella, Juan Carlos; Petersen, Lars Press; Andersen, Michael A. E.
Proceedings of 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS). IEEE, 2015. p. 1019-1023.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Article in proceedings › Research › peer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - A Comparison between Boundary and Continuous Conduction Modes in Single Phase PFC Using 600V Range Devices

AU - Hernandez Botella, Juan Carlos

AU - Petersen, Lars Press

AU - Andersen, Michael A. E.

N1 - Conference code: 11

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - This paper presents an analysis and comparison of boundary conduction mode (BCM) and continuous conduction mode (CCM) in single phase power factor correction (PFC) applications. The comparison is based on double pulse tester (DPT) characterization results of state-of-the-art superjunction devices in the 600V range. The measured switching energy is used to evaluate the devices performance in a conventional PFC. This data is used together with a mathematical model for prediction of the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI). This allows comparing the different devices in BCM and CCM operation modes and evaluating the performance as a function of the PFC power density and efficiency.

AB - This paper presents an analysis and comparison of boundary conduction mode (BCM) and continuous conduction mode (CCM) in single phase power factor correction (PFC) applications. The comparison is based on double pulse tester (DPT) characterization results of state-of-the-art superjunction devices in the 600V range. The measured switching energy is used to evaluate the devices performance in a conventional PFC. This data is used together with a mathematical model for prediction of the conducted electromagnetic interference (EMI). This allows comparing the different devices in BCM and CCM operation modes and evaluating the performance as a function of the PFC power density and efficiency.

KW - Power factor correction (PFC)

KW - Boundary (BCM)

KW - Continuous conduction mode (CCM)

KW - Conducted EMI

KW - Power density

KW - Efficiency

KW - Evaluation

U2 - 10.1109/PEDS.2015.7203487

DO - 10.1109/PEDS.2015.7203487

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 9781479944033

SP - 1019

EP - 1023

BT - Proceedings of 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems (PEDS)

PB - IEEE

T2 - 2015 IEEE 11th International Conference on Power Electronics and Drive Systems

Y2 - 9 June 2015 through 12 June 2015

ER -

A Comparison between Boundary and Continuous Conduction Modes in Single Phase PFC Using 600V Range Devices

Abstract

Conference

Keywords

Access to Document

OpenUrl availability

Fingerprint

Cite this