A Comparative Study of Greenfield Tunnelling in Sands: FEM, DEM, and Centrifuge Modelling

Geyang Song, Andrea Franza, Itai Elkayam, Alec Marshall, Assaf Klar

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

Abstract

The effect of tunnel construction on ground displacements is an important problem for tunnelling engineers. Numerical methods, including continuum and discrete element methods, have been used to evaluate tunnelling induced ground displacements. In this paper, the ability of numerical methods to replicate the response to tunnelling of a real soil is evaluated by comparing results from numerical analyses with experimental data obtained from geotechnical centrifuge tests. The centrifuge tests include two types of tunnel boundary condition: pressure-controlled (water extracted from model tunnel within a flexible membrane) or displacement controlled (rigid boundary model tunnel undergoing an eccentric contraction). Centrifuge measurements are compared against discrete element method (DEM) and finite element method (FEM) analyses which replicate the conditions of the experiments: pressure controlled boundary for FEM and DEM; displacement controlled boundary for FEM only. The effects of tunnel boundary condition on the soil displacement mechanisms are illustrated and the performance of the numerical analyses to replicate salient features of ground response are discussed.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publicationMicro to MACRO Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics
PublisherSpringer
Publication date2019
Pages337-345
ISBN (Print)978-3-319-99473-4
ISBN (Electronic) 978-3-319-99474-1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2019
SeriesTrends in Mathematics

Keywords

  • Discrete element method (DEM)
  • Finite element method (FEM)
  • Tunnelling
  • Centrifuge

Cite this

Song, G., Franza, A., Elkayam, I., Marshall, A., & Klar, A. (2019). A Comparative Study of Greenfield Tunnelling in Sands: FEM, DEM, and Centrifuge Modelling. In Micro to MACRO Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics (pp. 337-345). Springer. Trends in Mathematics https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99474-1_34
Song, Geyang ; Franza, Andrea ; Elkayam, Itai ; Marshall, Alec ; Klar, Assaf. / A Comparative Study of Greenfield Tunnelling in Sands: FEM, DEM, and Centrifuge Modelling. Micro to MACRO Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics. Springer, 2019. pp. 337-345 (Trends in Mathematics).
@inproceedings{e2e1016f2bdd415fa1f84192bc08ffdf,
title = "A Comparative Study of Greenfield Tunnelling in Sands: FEM, DEM, and Centrifuge Modelling",
abstract = "The effect of tunnel construction on ground displacements is an important problem for tunnelling engineers. Numerical methods, including continuum and discrete element methods, have been used to evaluate tunnelling induced ground displacements. In this paper, the ability of numerical methods to replicate the response to tunnelling of a real soil is evaluated by comparing results from numerical analyses with experimental data obtained from geotechnical centrifuge tests. The centrifuge tests include two types of tunnel boundary condition: pressure-controlled (water extracted from model tunnel within a flexible membrane) or displacement controlled (rigid boundary model tunnel undergoing an eccentric contraction). Centrifuge measurements are compared against discrete element method (DEM) and finite element method (FEM) analyses which replicate the conditions of the experiments: pressure controlled boundary for FEM and DEM; displacement controlled boundary for FEM only. The effects of tunnel boundary condition on the soil displacement mechanisms are illustrated and the performance of the numerical analyses to replicate salient features of ground response are discussed.",
keywords = "Discrete element method (DEM), Finite element method (FEM), Tunnelling, Centrifuge",
author = "Geyang Song and Andrea Franza and Itai Elkayam and Alec Marshall and Assaf Klar",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1007/978-3-319-99474-1_34",
language = "English",
isbn = "978-3-319-99473-4",
pages = "337--345",
booktitle = "Micro to MACRO Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics",
publisher = "Springer",

}

Song, G, Franza, A, Elkayam, I, Marshall, A & Klar, A 2019, A Comparative Study of Greenfield Tunnelling in Sands: FEM, DEM, and Centrifuge Modelling. in Micro to MACRO Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics. Springer, Trends in Mathematics, pp. 337-345. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99474-1_34

A Comparative Study of Greenfield Tunnelling in Sands: FEM, DEM, and Centrifuge Modelling. / Song, Geyang; Franza, Andrea; Elkayam, Itai; Marshall, Alec; Klar, Assaf.

Micro to MACRO Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics. Springer, 2019. p. 337-345 (Trends in Mathematics).

Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceedingArticle in proceedingsResearchpeer-review

TY - GEN

T1 - A Comparative Study of Greenfield Tunnelling in Sands: FEM, DEM, and Centrifuge Modelling

AU - Song, Geyang

AU - Franza, Andrea

AU - Elkayam, Itai

AU - Marshall, Alec

AU - Klar, Assaf

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - The effect of tunnel construction on ground displacements is an important problem for tunnelling engineers. Numerical methods, including continuum and discrete element methods, have been used to evaluate tunnelling induced ground displacements. In this paper, the ability of numerical methods to replicate the response to tunnelling of a real soil is evaluated by comparing results from numerical analyses with experimental data obtained from geotechnical centrifuge tests. The centrifuge tests include two types of tunnel boundary condition: pressure-controlled (water extracted from model tunnel within a flexible membrane) or displacement controlled (rigid boundary model tunnel undergoing an eccentric contraction). Centrifuge measurements are compared against discrete element method (DEM) and finite element method (FEM) analyses which replicate the conditions of the experiments: pressure controlled boundary for FEM and DEM; displacement controlled boundary for FEM only. The effects of tunnel boundary condition on the soil displacement mechanisms are illustrated and the performance of the numerical analyses to replicate salient features of ground response are discussed.

AB - The effect of tunnel construction on ground displacements is an important problem for tunnelling engineers. Numerical methods, including continuum and discrete element methods, have been used to evaluate tunnelling induced ground displacements. In this paper, the ability of numerical methods to replicate the response to tunnelling of a real soil is evaluated by comparing results from numerical analyses with experimental data obtained from geotechnical centrifuge tests. The centrifuge tests include two types of tunnel boundary condition: pressure-controlled (water extracted from model tunnel within a flexible membrane) or displacement controlled (rigid boundary model tunnel undergoing an eccentric contraction). Centrifuge measurements are compared against discrete element method (DEM) and finite element method (FEM) analyses which replicate the conditions of the experiments: pressure controlled boundary for FEM and DEM; displacement controlled boundary for FEM only. The effects of tunnel boundary condition on the soil displacement mechanisms are illustrated and the performance of the numerical analyses to replicate salient features of ground response are discussed.

KW - Discrete element method (DEM)

KW - Finite element method (FEM)

KW - Tunnelling

KW - Centrifuge

U2 - 10.1007/978-3-319-99474-1_34

DO - 10.1007/978-3-319-99474-1_34

M3 - Article in proceedings

SN - 978-3-319-99473-4

SP - 337

EP - 345

BT - Micro to MACRO Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics

PB - Springer

ER -

Song G, Franza A, Elkayam I, Marshall A, Klar A. A Comparative Study of Greenfield Tunnelling in Sands: FEM, DEM, and Centrifuge Modelling. In Micro to MACRO Mathematical Modelling in Soil Mechanics. Springer. 2019. p. 337-345. (Trends in Mathematics). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99474-1_34